The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company When XYZ lays off employees it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating r sum s and developing interviewing skills if they so desire Laid off employees have benefited greatl

Essay topics:

The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company.

"When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating résumés and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited greatly from Delany's services: last year those who used Delany found jobs much more quickly than did those who did not. Recently, it has been proposed that we use the less expensive Walsh Personnel Firm in place of Delany. This would be a mistake because eight years ago, when XYZ was using Walsh, only half of the workers we laid off at that time found jobs within a year. Moreover, Delany is clearly superior, as evidenced by its bigger staff and larger number of branch offices. After all, last year Delany's clients took an average of six months to find jobs, whereas Walsh's clients took nine."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

The prompt supports the idea of XYZ company to consider Delany Firm to the Walsh Firm in helping their employees to land good jobs. The author has provided some logical reasoning, however, much of the logical flaws are inflicted in the premises of the argument. These assumptions are to be mentioned followed by sufficient clarifications.

To begin with - the author belives in a speciality of the De;any Firm that the it has played a vital role in landing jobs for the laid-off employees of previous year from the time mentioned. However, he has disregarded the endurance or enthusisam of those laid-of employees in saying so. What if the laid-off employees had worked real hard by themsleves to obtain a very good resume? What if they had landed the jobs solely out of their skills in their respective jobs rather then any type of rigourous interviews the Delany Firm taughts? Good chances that many of those employees who had been laid-off earlier might not face any difficulty in appearing to other companies provided that they had sufficient recommendations. Also, we can not neglect the fac that the author has not provided necessary data comparing the assistanship doesrs vs non-doers, to capitulate a certain result. However, if any of these assumptions are proved to be true then the regarsd of the author to Delany Firm might be reconsidered.

Secondly - the auhthor believes that the scenario and job requirements have not been changed since last long eight years. He speculated that Wlash Firm was quite expensive compared to Delany Firm and unproductive too for many employees. However, what is the gurantee that the Delany Firm employees are not earlier Walsh Firm goers? They might be the ones who had gone to Walsh Firm and had learned sufficient things which in return had invested greatly in learning the other things very fastly and accurately in Delany Firms. Might be the case that those who did not land good placements might be because of their inability or for other reasons which, in many cases, might niot have to do anything with the Wlash Firm. It is also a matter of fact that - in eight years many things can be changed. The Walsh Firm might not be the same one it was earlier, provided that it was arguebly incompetence to Delany Firm, as it is now. It might have reduced its cost and developed better working necessasities and it is not impossible to assume believe that it might have eventually surpassed the same of the Delany Firm. If that is the case or any of the mentioned possiblity are proved to be true then there is no reasong to presume that the Delany Firm might be more productive for the employees than the Walsh Firm; provided that the latter has improved its competence with modern time.

Thirdly, the auhthor belives that larger staffs and numerous branch offices are the signals of a discreetly superior Firm for employees ot be assigned as it is in the case of Delany Firm. But is not it a concern for the employess rather than a boon? Might be the case that the newly appointed employees do not get sufficient attention or care by the hosts contray to the affablity and sanguine behavours of the Walsh Firm although less spacious than Denly Firm. However, the author did not idealize any logics behind the relationship of bigger staffs and branches with the quality of the appointed employees base don which the comparison can be evaluated. Another thing is assumed from the author is that - Delany's clinets need lesser time to land jobs compared to the Walsh one's that is why they more priviledged to get more employess from them. However, the author missed the points here is - that landing early jobs might not be as potent sign of an employee as the rank of that jobs is for the same one. And based on this if an employee has laned earlier yeat less demanded jobs compared to the dilatory one but jobs worthy of his quality then the later one will be the gainer. But the author did not provide any notion of the quality of the alned jobs of the employees of Denly Firm. So, more evidence is needed to articulate to any decision.

So, looking at all the ideas and factors presented above it might be safe to say that - it requires more evidences and logical reasoning to come to any conclusion provided that the questions asked in the essay are properly answered with sufficient data; upshoting an authentic conclusion.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...in a speciality of the De;any Firm that the it has played a vital role in landing jobs...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
... skills in their respective jobs rather then any type of rigourous interviews the De...
^^^^
Line 7, column 690, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uated. Another thing is assumed from the author is that - Delanys clinets need le...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, another thing, in many cases, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 42.0 19.6327345309 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 11.1786427146 170% => OK
Relative clauses : 28.0 13.6137724551 206% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 55.0 28.8173652695 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 55.5748502994 158% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3621.0 2260.96107784 160% => OK
No of words: 760.0 441.139720559 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76447368421 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.25053306857 4.56307096286 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56429335684 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 317.0 204.123752495 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.417105263158 0.468620217663 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1125.0 705.55239521 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 19.7664670659 147% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3356046983 57.8364921388 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.862068966 119.503703932 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2068965517 23.324526521 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.24137931034 5.70786347227 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223549794574 0.218282227539 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727883464183 0.0743258471296 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583728099053 0.0701772020484 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133535342264 0.128457276422 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669608583746 0.0628817314937 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.3799401198 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.3550499002 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 164.0 98.500998004 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 15 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 35 2
No. of Sentences: 29 15
No. of Words: 761 350
No. of Characters: 3553 1500
No. of Different Words: 315 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 5.252 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.669 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.507 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 235 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 177 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 125 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 80 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.241 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.905 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.724 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.308 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.467 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.118 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5