Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students. At first glance this claim looks reasonable and even worth pondering about. But many do not consider the various factors that are taken into account while planning a curriculum that students follow. This factors might include, the region the organization is established in, the resources they are able to acquire, availability of faculty to teach a particular subject and so on.
Educators plan these courses considering students as whole rather than for a single individual. This infers that the interests of majority is often given priority than the opinions of few. Educators, who are experts in their field and have an experience of decades in teaching and administering students ,deliberate and construct these courses in order to provide the right path to the pupil. This process is verified by other experts in the field and is sanctioned only when it is deemed appropriate and worthy. Any subject that is considered not good enough will be discarded, this include those with not enough back ground information, subjects with unclear results and subjects that are not appropriate for age of the students it is being made for.
Students are malleable creatures who do not research much before making their claims. They posses interests that are self satisfying and often benefits only themselves. This attitude is found in many pupil. Consider a student who is interested in astronomy. It is a great subject with good recognition. But forcing other students who are not interested in this great subject is counter productive. Adding to this, consider a class where the majority is interested in origami and are interested in learning it in schools or colleges. They might even make claims that it is a subject they are passionate about and wouldn't mind working hard in it. Incorporating this subject that practically adds nothing to the resumes or the skill set that a student must posses for a future, is foolish and not required.
Educators do their best to include all the necessary subjects that are needed to provide the pupil in depth knowledge of the course. This could include subjects that are harder and difficult to pass through and subjects that require at most physical work and taxing to brain. This could lead to resentment in students. Many might lose interest and not appreciate the subject enough. It is like mathematics. There are more students in the world that hate the subject than those who love it. Almost every student claim to have a bad relationship with this particular subject. Many say they do not feel any kind of motivation to continue the subject further after school or college. But that doesn't stop them from using it everyday, nor give the educational institutes an excuse to get rid of it. These hard courses share the same fate. Though it is hated, that strong dislike does not stop students from using it in that particular field and appreciating it later.
Apart from the curriculum, the way the teaching is propagated within a classroom also plays a role in determining the motivation of a student to learn. Consider mathematics again. It is a difficult and most hated subject. But having an educator with a good diction and amazing ability to make things clearer and more accurate is a boon to these students and it could even end up changing their minds about the subject. Similarly if these students are stuck with an educator who barely knows anything and have a complicated style of teaching, the hatred students share for the subject might ascend even more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ty than the opinions of few. Educators, who are experts in their field and have an expe...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s in teaching and administering students ,deliberate and construct these courses i...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun pupil seems to be countable; consider using: 'many pupils'.
Suggestion: many pupils
...y themselves. This attitude is found in many pupil. Consider a student who is interested i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...a subject they are passionate about and wouldnt mind working hard in it. Incorporating ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 319, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
...s could lead to resentment in students. Many might lose interest and not appreciate the su...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 689, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rther after school or college. But that doesnt stop them from using it everyday, nor g...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 720, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...But that doesnt stop them from using it everyday, nor give the educational institutes an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...changing their minds about the subject. Similarly if these students are stuck with an edu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, similarly, so, while, apart from, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 62.0 33.0505617978 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3020.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 604.0 442.535393258 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95746018188 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66937327921 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471854304636 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 943.2 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.8999778521 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8235294118 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.02941176471 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273224628866 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735342936484 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756402662119 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177118238812 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649532244174 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.