College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.
In today's fast-paced world, where talent is highly valued, one should pursue career in which one has mastery. Some might argue that learning what the industry requires or the subjects which would led to a job would be beneficial, but I disagree with them. The validation of my view would be explain in the following essay.
Education is birthright of all human beings irrespective, of their gender, race, and culture. Educators or educational instituities are mere facilitators which imparts knowledge. At first it seems benefical and right-way to get a job would be to only study the subjects which are required for that position and ignoring the rest. However, this would be a wrong approach as the person would be limited to one type of role and progress would not happen. For instance, if a person has a short-term goal to achieve a job as supply chain analyst, so for that the candidated only studied the subjects like logistics, excel, SQL, etc. But, this would surely help the candidate to attain the job but he would be stuck in this position if he has knowledge of only these subjects. To excel in his carrer he should learn and upgrade his knowledge and learn new things.
In the past few decades technology has grown rapidly, expontentially and has been limitless. It was in the year 1950 when for the first time Alan Turing asked the question 'Can machines think?' this led to a new field of innovation; the field of Artificial Intelligence or AI. AI is used to automate work and complete the task with more optimisation. So, in few years many jobs would be taken over by AI and humans would be unemployed. This is currently happening in the infomation technology jobs; IT jobs. IT jobs was considered one of the best career options in the last decade, but due to increasement in technologies and AI, the jobs are getting replaced by machines. So, the people who might have just learn subjects about IT in the college would suffer as they might have lost their jobs.
However, colleges should not only focus on imparting theoretical knowledge. They should also provide subjects which has practical use in the industries, as this would help students to attain a job. College should constantly update their curriculums and add subjects which are required in the market. This would help the students to attain the latest current trends which are going on in industries.
In conclusion, I would like to say that though the final aim of attaining an education is to obtain a job but only studying the subjects which are required for it would be harmful. Studying a particular set of subjects would create a tunnel vision and restrict the creativity of the students and ability to think out of the box solutions. Any knowledge which we learn would be beneficial for us in someway or other. So, we should not restrict ourself by just studying a few subjects to attain a job. We should think of a larger picture rather than immediate benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'decades'' or 'decade's'?
Suggestion: decades'; decade's
... and learn new things. In the past few decades technology has grown rapidly, expontent...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: ASK_THE_QUESTION[1]
Message: Use simply 'asked' instead.
Suggestion: asked
...950 when for the first time Alan Turing asked the question Can machines think? this led to a new f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... asked the question Can machines think? this led to a new field of innovation; the f...
^^^^
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...picture rather than immediate benefits.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 29.0 12.4196629213 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2443.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 511.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78082191781 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67623811552 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489236790607 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3473342342 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.4814814815 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9259259259 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2962962963 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219443537284 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634641945537 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472705459601 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137431307196 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363651741737 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.