Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.

Where this statement required to have good experiences by working in some fields of science which are relevant to the course at the education curriculum it depend on a variety factors. In my point of view, this requirement would be better in some sphere of science.
The main reason for my view is that the all of the medical subjects must be taught by medical professors or educators. For example, in most cases for medical students the lectures given by doctors, which have a medical practice currently. Also, it gives a lot of conveniences not only for students, but also for lecture, because lectures have to revise the subject by syllabus. It leads to learn by heart all of the theoretical side of the profession, consequently they would be felt more confident at the job.
Another reason for my view is the sphere of journalism, if in this field of faculty, students would be taught by lectures which have a good experience in some periodical, after graduate students could easy adapt to future work, because the tutor gave them knowledge by practical point of view. Especially it concerns of young journalist who decide to make career at hot spot places. In common situations it is impossible to work at war time as a reporter, as far as it demands to have a best practice and just graduated student may have not it at all, but if he or she takes knowledge from professor who has a good experience it would be better to deal with any problem at job.
Some might argue that job satisfaction not connected with this statement. Yet, in another cases it is quite possible disconnectedness of experience of lecture by pedagogical point of view. However, the life proves contrary, as it was said above the know ledges taking by best practiced tutor will give to youth a lot of conveniences at their future.
To sum up, I totally agree that all educators have to spend time to work at places which is relevant to their curriculum at colleges or universities

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Where this statement required to have good ex...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'depends'?
Suggestion: depends
...e course at the education curriculum it depend on a variety factors. In my point of vi...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 41, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...The main reason for my view is that the all of the medical subjects must be taught by medi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...by syllabus. It leads to learn by heart all of the theoretical side of the profession, con...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... reporter, as far as it demands to have a best practice and just graduated studen...
^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e proves contrary, as it was said above the know ledges taking by best practiced tutor w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r curriculum at colleges or universities
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, for example, in most cases, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 344.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72093023256 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76650731729 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531976744186 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4222013175 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.923076923 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4615384615 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112058358278 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435146596683 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06435599616 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851109364199 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810102527833 0.0667264976115 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.