The company management's decision regarding routine monitoring of all employee e-mail is highly acceptable from the employer point of view. But when It comes to employee side, It impedes his privacy and restricts the freedom of employee in some aspects. I stand by the side that routine mail monitoring is essential for a company's management to prevent from harms.
The fact that company should keep a eye on routine monitoring of employee e-mail is highly safer. Whenever there is a virus or malware wade across the internet, there is a high chance of attracting the employee towards the malware in the name of advertisements. The employee get fascinated by the ads and tend to click the link, followed by giving his mail id and attracts the malware to his mail id. It could be prevented, If the company, keeps an eye on monitoring the employee e-mail. This could be eradicated before It becomes even severe.
On the other hand, the company can limit the wastage of resources who are laxing their time at the cost of the company. Therefore, by this effective monitoring, companies can find out the employees, who are really utilizing the company's resource for getting their work done. The company can trace out If an employee is engaging illegal activities or trying to seek out some perilous activities.
Further, in order to abide by the corporate rules, a company should keep a track on such mail monitoring. In case, If the company, fails to take a notice of it, may sometimes, end up in unexpected consequences. For example, If an employee's mail id is being hacked by the terrorists, the companies, at such case, should take necessary action and ban the infested mail id. That is, by this way, an employer is responsible for the prevention of national threat.
Above all, If the company management, decides to track the employee's mail, then there is a possibility that the work efficiency can be highly achieved.
Finally, as per the saying, "too much of anything, is good for nothing", there should be some criteria for the company to manage their mail monitoring. Not all the things, which the employee considers his privacy should be monitored. If it is for the sake of company's safety and prevent employee from the harms of the internet, then this mail monitoring process is highly encouraged.
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 50
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways 50
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.Write a response in which you di 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
...s. The fact that company should keep a eye on routine monitoring of employee e...
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...pany can limit the wastage of resources who are laxing their time at the cost of the co...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, really, regarding, so, then, therefore, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9387755102 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7816184287 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487244897959 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6119488557 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.894736842 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6315789474 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318538318401 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111854568337 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817240569705 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174637169003 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579154854422 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.