Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence.
Creativity means the ability to create something new or give an original idea and whereas intelligence means acquire knowledge and apply it in a useful field. The author claims that creativity should be the only measure of true intelligence. But, the author states is quite biased and incomplete. Because the two terms creativity and intelligence vary from a different field.
Firstly, the term intelligent varies from field to field whether it may business, politics, film or marketing service. For example, a computer engineer can be accepted as intelligence if he or she is able to solve any problem without bug, very efficient time and can present a new innovative idea. Moreover, a director can be accepted as innovative if he or she propounds the film with good graphics, script and dialogue etc.
Take an instance in case of an artist and a doctor. An artist who is praised for his creativity for creating something new and appealing to the people and present an innovative notion with their art. On the other hand, a doctor who is not creative but diagnosis the diseases of the patients and give a cure too. Here, the doctor applies his knowledge that he acquires. Thus, it can say that a doctor is more intelligence than the artist. So, for different field measuring intelligence and creativity is difficult.
There is the numerous number of legend who is known for their outstanding work like Albert Einstein and D.J.K Abdul Kalam Azad. They changed the world with their innovative notions. The question were they intelligent or creative? They acquire knowledge, developing ideas and then implement that knowledge for change the world. So, creativity is not only measuring element of intelligent.
To conclude, intelligence and creativity are not quite analogous but not same and creativity is not the judging factor of intelligence. The term intelligence is varied from field to field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
..., very efficient time and can present a new innovative idea. Moreover, a director can be acce...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...nding work like Albert Einstein and D.J.K Abdul Kalam Azad. They changed the worl...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, whereas, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 58.6224719101 39% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 312.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11858974359 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87316638209 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522435897436 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8914464516 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.85 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243344300844 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866386237777 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159625052084 0.0758088955206 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1430830137 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113604699008 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.