Judgement is one of the arduous task. Before judging anyone's hard work critically, one should have depth knowledge in related subject matter. However, we can get many such people in the market who try to be pundit in every subject matter and do acerbic criticism on other's hard work. I would like to suggest to all hard-workers that please do not care to critical judgment of little knowledge people, pay attention to only them who are expert in related subject matter.
The first reason of my belief is that little knowledge is very dangerous. The little knowledge people have common problem that they cannot judge anythings from both pro and con side. They only can do is negative comments. They think that there are no more things are correct than they know. The expert people are the one who already have spent much time and effort to understand the many aspects of related works. They can judge every aspect of the work by mentioning strongest and weakest point.
The second reason of my belief is that critical judgment of an expert can show the path of improvement whereas the little knowledge people's judgement demoralize the worker. For example, last year I had done one research work on support system of underground structure. I had tried a lot to accomplish that work finely. At the end of the day, when my final presentation of my research work was going one electrical engineer did so many unnecessary comment on my research work. Even I tried my best to convince to him, he did not listen at all. At same day, my main research committee member, who is an expert in related topics, do praise at my works. He also did some comment as suggestion to improve the quality of my research work. I had accepted his comment and had applied his comment on my research document. Finally, that research work is recently published in renown journal.
Perhaps the best reason is that critical judgement of an expert helps to create innovative idea, concept and creation. For instance, two years ago, when I worked as tunnel engineer, I got serious problem in expanding tunnel. I requested my management to hire some expert as consultant. The expert team came and judge my design. They found one flaws and we discussed a lot to correct that flaws. Finally, they suggest me to change slight the design to avoid problematic zone. I did accord to their suggestion and the problem was solved. I am implementing this idea still to solve many such kind of problems.
By making long story short, the critical judgement of an expert will help hard worker to increase the quality of his work, to learn innovative idea and to expand his knowledge. So, the critical judgement of an expert is valuable for us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the arduous task. Before judging anyones hard work critically, one should have de...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entioning strongest and weakest point. The second reason of my belief is that c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, second, so, still, whereas, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75159235669 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51426661196 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494692144374 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 6.24550561798 272% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8389138526 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1724137931 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2413793103 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.20689655172 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192432122082 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547591879748 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530217781009 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122918831705 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440755476687 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.