Young people are the property of every nation. Energetic youth are needed in every sector of a society like government, industry or another field for the secure bright future of respected society. However, the should have to be motivated to lead the society with cooperative way rather than competitive way. So, I strongly agree with the salutatory statement given in the issue task.
The first reason for my belief is that Cooperation maintains resonance environment in the society, while competition maintains dissonance environment. As we all know that youth mind and blood are very capricious. They can be easily buttressed by any interest group. If they compete with each other, some of the interest group in the society may be paly for the benefit and bellicose environment may resemble in the society. On the flip side, if the youth respect each other and lead the society with a unified theme, no any interest group can interfere with the concord of a society.
The second reason for my belief is that a competition promotes individual progress and degrees whereas a cooperation promotes combine benefits. For instance, if a person is selected in a CEO of any organization by competition, his prime goal is to expand his career and get more benefits as much as possible. On the other hand, if a person is selected in a CEO position by nomination from a group of deserving youth fellows, his main motto will not get a more personal benefit. He or she starts to do first betterment for a society, simply because he does not want to be far from their support and admiration.
Moreover, it is not always necessary that youth should have to lead the society in the sense of cooperation rather than competition. Sometimes, a healthy competition between eligible candidate should also be promoted, especially, in the field where logical thinking is needed. For example, if an organization is seeking the best policy to make an organization better, the competition among the talented candidates will be better than cooperation.
By making a long story short, youth should have to lead every aspect of society with cooperation between them. A healthy competition between the eligible candidate also cannot be avoided so far.
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 50
- Critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- "According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies ac 29
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...group. If they compete with each other, some of the interest group in the society may be pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... lead the society with a unified theme, no any interest group can interfere with t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0269541779 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84832336598 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517520215633 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6010399429 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.611111111 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201380259766 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596339650296 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444805311079 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108425750031 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469623813722 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.