We all know that when people are angry and do something, they will regret back. Do you know why? It is because when they are angry, they possess some negative emotions and most of the time decision made with emotion will turn out wrong. And we can also find those people who do wrong decision with emotion first and later try to overwhelm his mistake in decision making with unnecessary logic when negative consequences occurred. They actually try to pretend as a good decision maker. Decision making is purely a mental work, not an emotional one. So, I support the statement that people who make a decision based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterward are poor decision makers.
I have seen many people, who promise many things when they were in a relationship. When they got married, they argue with each other by raising the question on their previous promises. And, they try to add some conditions, constrained and other logic to prove that they were right. In fact, they took the wrong decision with emotions. Do you think they are a good decision maker? The answer is obviously, No.
Emotions are a weakness of any brave and scholar people. When people became emotion to something, they usually will not see pro and con side. They just need it to do. For example, Hitler was a brave and intellectual leader of the 18th century. He was a threat to the rest world in his time. He took one decision of killing Yehudi people with an emotion. He tried to prove his decision was correct with much logic. Finally, he was able to form a group against Yahudi people. At the end of the day, many Yehudi people died. That decision made Hitler hero to villain. Nowadays many history writers expose Hitler as a wrong decision maker.
Good decision maker people see pro and con side before taking any decision. I have seen many good decision people, who never take any decision when they were drunk, angry and heartbroken. They believe that even logical thinking took time; it will ensure the betterness of tomorrow. It does not mean that we will have to take all the decision with logic and qualitative reasoning. We may have to take some decision with emotion and a pure heart, especially in love and relation.
By making a long story short, people should have to see pro and con side before taking any decision. Sometimes some decision turns to wrong in the flow of time. We will have to learn from that mistake and correct it further instead of giving logic to prove that as a wrong. Please do not be poor decision maker by taking the decision based on emotion and justifying with logic afterward.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion maker? The answer is obviously, No. Emotions are a weakness of any brave and...
^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Yehudi) must be used with a third-person verb: 'peoples'.
Suggestion: peoples
... He took one decision of killing Yehudi people with an emotion. He tried to prove his ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... killing Yehudi people with an emotion. He tried to prove his decision was correct...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, if, may, so, for example, in fact, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2158.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66090712743 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31753787709 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447084233261 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 6.24550561798 368% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1606117723 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.4375 118.986275619 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.46875 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.34375 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.508142049307 0.243740707755 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150240488732 0.0831039109588 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179916748824 0.0758088955206 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326649848254 0.150359130593 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159716450089 0.0667264976115 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 14.1392134831 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.38706741573 80% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.