Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
critics tend to judge a definite work from some fixed criteria which may not always give proper judgment to the work. being an expert in a field does not ensure accuracy in judgment all the time. there are many cases where someone not so expert in a field gives significant judgment to that particular field of work.
judgment varies from one field to another. For example, in academia, experts do hold the position to judge a work as this field is strictly maintained with definite rules and regulations. If a researcher publishes a paper on , say, environmental science, he or she has to present that paper work at the recognised journals and has to be accepted by the jargons of that field. Here an opinion from someone not so expert does not hold water. Same goes for skill based fields like sports where the coach judges the performances of the athletes and designs the game plan accordingly.
On the other hand, fields where skill measurement is not limited in definite rules and regulations, for example, art or Literature, may have good critic from the nonspecialists. Leonardo Da Vinci painted his legendary work "Monalisa" which is widely accepted, be it the specialists from art or common mass who do not have much depth over artistic criticism. Moreover, a piece of art, for instance, an art film, might be criticized by the experts but could be a blockbuster hit for wide appreciation from the viewers. In this case, non experts are contributing in a significant amount of Judgment. The scenario could be up side down where a movie which is highly praised by the experts, could not be commercially hit for not getting enough appreciation, more specifically, being criticized by the viewers.
When experts give judgment over a specific work, there could be conflicts among them. one group may like the work where the other group may not find the work praise worthy. As a consequence, the judgment that hold majority would win. In this case, one group of critics is completely being rejected for their judgment which means there expertness with being critics has nothing to do with the work.
In conclusion, critical judgments from the experts may hold significance for certain cases but not for any or every field. Both the experts and the nonexperts can make valuable critical judgments for many fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Critics
critics tend to judge a definite work from some...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Being
...lways give proper judgment to the work. being an expert in a field does not ensure ac...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...sure accuracy in judgment all the time. there are many cases where someone not so exp...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Judgment
...nt to that particular field of work. judgment varies from one field to another. For e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ns. If a researcher publishes a paper on , say, environmental science, he or she h...
^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...k, there could be conflicts among them. one group may like the work where the other...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, may, moreover, so, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95419847328 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82965330451 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501272264631 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1694837939 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.473684211 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6842105263 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352900947357 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135469238221 0.0831039109588 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784462632224 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243291878881 0.150359130593 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863948358754 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.