Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs
Above petition is saying that from last three years sidewalk rage has been increased as well as it result in sidewalk assaults, property damage, and distruption of normal pedestrian traffic. And in order to address this problem speaker suggesting to council of Centerville to enforce the new law which will ban the cell phones use on sidewalk because similar law was passed by middletown and it result in decrease in sidewalk crime.
Firstly, speaker is assuming that the problem which Centervill is facing is all similar to the problem that Middletown has solved. It is might possible that the problems of this two towns are different or problems of Middletown might have less severe and therefore the law is worked for them. Or the problem is related to the use of cell phones on sidewalk. But in given information it not clear to us that the problem of Centervill is caused due to the cell phone use on sidewalk. Speaker also assume that the sidewalk rage is result of use of cell phone on sidewalk and nothing else.
It might possible that there are numbers thing involved in order to cause these assault, property damage etc. And speaker not stating any other thing that might have influence on the problem that growing over last three years. and that means in last three years some things have changed, but it not show the cell phone use is increased in last three years.
Taking every thing in account, we can't conclude that the law passed by Middletown will work for the Centervill. Therefore, I'll suggest to the council of Centervill that on only basis of petition new law should not be forced on peopl
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'results'?
Suggestion: results
...lar law was passed by middletown and it result in decrease in sidewalk crime. Firstly...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clears'?
Suggestion: clears
...dewalk. But in given information it not clear to us that the problem of Centervill is...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...lem that growing over last three years. and that means in last three years some thi...
^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shows'?
Suggestion: shows
...rs some things have changed, but it not show the cell phone use is increased in last...
^^^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ars. Taking every thing in account, we cant conclude that the law passed by Middlet...
^^^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...ill work for the Centervill. Therefore, Ill suggest to the council of Centervill th...
^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ill) must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...work for the Centervill. Therefore, Ill suggest to the council of Centervill that on on...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 2235.4752809 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 282.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72695035461 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40018536665 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 215.323595506 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460992907801 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7806242024 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.083333333 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0323413227617 0.243740707755 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0154890395503 0.0831039109588 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0161856118146 0.0758088955206 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0207448062556 0.150359130593 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00576706070715 0.0667264976115 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 100.480337079 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.