As my concern, we should not abandon either of the assessment in that the students' learning could be evaluated in different degrees. Learing knowledge is a precrdure of discovering onself, then others and the world. When we discuss the education, esspecailly the evaluation of the students' learning, we should analyze the stituaion seperately. I will address my views as below.
To begin with, not all the courses require the students that they should grasp the facts. In the literature and philosophy, the facts may not be the real fact we daily discuss with. Also there always some words we could not determine the real or unreal. When I was at High school, we were required to learn the classics of Laozi, a great Chinese phylosopher two thousand years ago.While lots of his words and slogans were so hard to figure out even the teacher could not explain them well. While when I grew up, I found I graudually realized some of the meaning while I still could not understand what it really means. When I turned to my dad, he told me, take it easy, you will find the meaning youself when you get older. My father could not tell the facts of all the Laozi classics Daode Jing, either.
On the other hand, there are some majors that the students should explain the facts' illustration. Especially, in Science area, nearly all of the courses need accurate explaination in that minor flaws can incurr major mistakes. There is a defination of proper living belt in Solar System which is the range of orbits if any palnets revovle in this routine the distance from the sun was proper for the existence of liquid water and also, they could be protected by other big planets from the collison of other planets or astroids. Thus this theoy should not only be well eplained and also be accurately calculated. This prescision perfectly defined the nature science.
As Shopenhuaer said , we should not recognize the world in each of our own eyes is what the world should be. It is true that any individual should define the world we are living in, likewise, the students' learning in different majors should not be assessed in a unique creterion.In my opinon, the students learning whoe major in Arts should not be neccessarily evalutate by the expainations of the facts which may confine their imagination. The students majoring in sicence courses, however should be required to explain the facts in their field objectively and accurately due to the nature of science.In all, I partly agree with this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...be the real fact we daily discuss with. Also there always some words we could not de...
^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...nese phylosopher two thousand years ago.While lots of his words and slogans were so h...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... grew up, I found I graudually realized some of the meaning while I still could not underst...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facts'' or 'fact's'?
Suggestion: facts'; fact's
...rs that the students should explain the facts illustration. Especially, in Science ar...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...on. Especially, in Science area, nearly all of the courses need accurate explaination in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the courses need accurate explaination in that minor flaws can incurr major mis...
^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... collison of other planets or astroids. Thus this theoy should not only be well epla...
^^^^
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... nature science. As Shopenhuaer said , we should not recognize the world in ea...
^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...d not be assessed in a unique creterion.In my opinon, the students learning whoe m...
^^
Line 7, column 603, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...accurately due to the nature of science.In all, I partly agree with this issue.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, may, really, so, still, then, thus, well, while, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82093023256 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58116452428 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532558139535 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.4276931134 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.105263158 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6315789474 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42105263158 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216897791987 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672579597931 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666017352029 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132302562498 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471169907168 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.