Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
It is the resoponsibility of the society to work under certains ethics and laws. The statement in this regards vaguely claims that individuals should follow laws which are percieved just and should disobey laws which are seemed unjust. Indisputably, it is very important for every individual of the society to follow basic priniples and laws for smooth governing. However, disobeying laws just based on personal judgement will lead to a chaotic situation within the society. Hence, I believe that individuals should follow basic principles and laws and at the same time, no one should disobey any law just based on personal subjective judgement.
Firstly, the statement doesn't clarify what constitues "just" and what constitutes "unjust" for an individual. Disobeying laws just based on personal opinions will not lead to peace and overall stability of the society. The reason being that the personal opinions, a lot of the times are dictated by the past experiences and the immediate situation, but not by the basic code of human ethics. For example, consider a situation where a person is in very urgent need of money for some personal emergency (or for even some societal benefit). Now, the haste deicisions that might strike to the mind involve malpractices like theft etc. If we take a while to understand the situation, any such action that will lead to his/her personal benefit, might cause a harm on some part of the society and if not checked might lead to some chaotic situation which can involve potential human lose. As the situation involved breaking some law which seemed "unjust" to the individual for the moment, it is not actually justified. Thus, breaking laws by claiming them unjust based on personal opinions should strictly be prohibited. Furthermore, strict punishments should be imposed on people breaking laws for personal benefit.
Moreover, by following laws, governement can ensure that harmony and peace is maintained in the society.
Having said that, it doesn't mean that every law that is being passed should be blindly followed by the society. If a society as a whole thinks that there is some need for reform, it should stand against the authority to ensure that the necessary change is being brought about. For instance, in the begining of 21st century abortion was illegal in the society. Hence, abortion was often practiced secretly and illegaly which involved unsanitary conditions, no safety for women, and very high prices. Society started revoling against this and necessary changes were brought about in the society. Thus, instead of just disobeying laws strong reforms and changes can be brought about when needed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...tains ethics and laws. The statement in this regards vaguely claims that individuals...
^^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e judgement. Firstly, the statement doesnt clarify what constitues 'just&apos...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
... a lot of the times are dictated by the past experiences and the immediate situation, but not by...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1093, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng laws by claiming them unjust based on personal opinions should strictly be pro...
^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...in the society. Having said that, it doesnt mean that every law that is being passe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, even so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2267.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25986078886 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82621846888 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480278422274 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0956151017 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.952380952 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5238095238 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243908599349 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820587018768 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691385697556 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155336097259 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114536461823 0.0667264976115 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.