“Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and
resist unjust laws.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In
developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or
examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement which claims people should obey the rules which think is truly adjusted and ignore the others that may seem unreliable is not convincing. Although there is some legislation which looks strange, ignoring the rules could lead to chaos or disorganizing. Likewise, in most democratic countries, laws are introducing by parliaments which are a good perspective of the societies. On the other hand, in dictator countries not all of the rules make hardship for individuals. I will explain these reasons explicitly in this issue.
The most important reason that people should respect the legislation in the country is that disobeying rules would lead to chaos and would be a detriment to society. For example, driving rules are designed by the government to provide safe roads and streets for individuals but someones may believe the speed limit is not a good rule to obey that. Apart from the fine that they may expose, it can make streets like car race competition that no one would be safe. In another type of legislation, a similar event could happen. For instance, a person may think prison for murder is not enough and decide to execute a killer. So, no one could feel safe in the country.
Another reason that should be considered is that the origin of most of the legislation is parliaments that are elected directly or indirectly by individuals in democratic countries. Parliament's members attend several meetings to introduce a law that needs hours of discussing and hearing different ideas. Therefore, the results of these meetings should be reliable rules which indicate the general perspectives of natives. Then, if there is any rule that an individual is not satisfied with that, he or she can talk with the parliament's members and request to change it. It would be a good idea for some rules which seem strange.
Some may maintain that in some countries which do not have a democratic system all of the processes of introducing legislation are incorrect and disobey the rules is the final approach that they can follow. I believe, in these societies, there are lots of laws that are useful and beneficial to follow and help the society to improve. Therefore, if this culture spread in the country that disobey rules is a great behavior then it would be difficult to change that and all of the legislation would not be respected.
In conclusion, I reckon, although in some countries there is not any reliable process for introducing and changing legislation, all of the people should follow the rules to protect society from its detriment consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e other hand, in dictator countries not all of the rules make hardship for individuals. I ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'maintains'.
Suggestion: maintains
...me rules which seem strange. Some may maintain that in some countries which do not hav...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...s which do not have a democratic system all of the processes of introducing legislation ar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 470, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...t would be difficult to change that and all of the legislation would not be respected. I...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...r introducing and changing legislation, all of the people should follow the rules to prote...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, look, may, so, then, therefore, apart from, for example, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98839907193 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79555890189 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457076566125 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.266763373 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.55 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0987616305144 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346765925497 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331118355642 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623215228782 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380486837275 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.