The role of traditional culture in countries and native cultures has always been a hot debate among people. Thus, governors in different countries try to assign funds to cultural activities to keep them safe or flourish. The claim maintains governments should provide adequate financial support for big cities to assure their thrive. The reason it provides is that major cities are the places that can preserve the traditional culture and generate new ones. I mostly agree with them and I explain my reasons now.
First of all, major cities are a mixture of people from all around the cities and villages around the country. People come from around the country with their traditions and try to do according to them in major cities. For instance, people in Tehran, the capital of Iran, are gathered from various cities, and in any traditional ceremony, you can find different types in different locations. I can name Ashora that Kashan natives have a special place for this ceremony. Thus, By providing adequate funds by the government the preservation of this tradition would be approved.
Moreover, major cities are the location of different cultural activities ranging from theatre, cinema to conferences, and carnivals. In these cities, you can find major publication companies that are working on publishing books, magazines, or newspapers. Thus, major cities due to the provided facilities could help the country to generate new cultural activities or preserve traditional ones. For example, New York is a good sample of cities with numerous cultural events from not only inside the United States but also around the world. It is the host of various conferences, ceremonies, and cultural activities. Therefore the government by providing adequate financial support not only preserved traditions and propose new cultural activities but also can improve the financial situation of cities because some of these activities have financial benefits for the city.
On the other hand, some may claim that the origin of most traditions is in the villages and small cities and major cities instead of preserving that, destroying the old ones and present new ones. They maintain, if governments want to preserve traditional culture, they should concentrate on villages with a special culture. Although we can find some culture in villages that are specific for that area and they are endangered of extinction, they are just some exception and we could not generalize them for all of the countries.
In conclusion, I believe major cities could assure to preserve traditional culture in the country if they have enough funds, so governer should provide adequate money for these purposes. Some may claim some villages have special cultures and are more important than major cities. However, it happens in exceptional situations and should not be considered as a general rule.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s, ceremonies, and cultural activities. Therefore the government by providing adequate fi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 507, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...on and we could not generalize them for all of the countries. In conclusion, I believe ma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
...uate money for these purposes. Some may claim some villages have special cultures and...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2412.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25490196078 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72769842745 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453159041394 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7413535558 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.636363636 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8636363636 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309683912757 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103476438169 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761709228131 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198573483766 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536338214196 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.