Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve

Essay topics:

Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.

Making decisions based on individuals or people's will is pivotal for governmental staff, as the consequences might be double-edged. On the positive side, making them according to themselves is high-effective, which could be chose to cope with emergencies; on the negative side, it is so authoritative that some holes could be hidden behind those decisions. And the analogous logic could be used on decision-making based on people's will. Thus, I suggest officials should exploit disparate strategies according to varied contexts.

For decisions made by officials themselves, advantages are relative to the decision's speed and efficiency. For example, when a mayor of a city encounters an emergency that terrorists threat the security of a school, there is no time for them to inform such news to interviewees and ask people's suggestions, instead, figuring out how to cope with it privately is merely a way to do. And such situation could suite departments that have special tasks, such as police department, fire department or military department. Since their mission's specialty and professionalism, deciding without carrying out the will of people is a way of decision-making that has the lowest side-effect. However, for departments serving for people as education and hospitality, if seizing an approach forbidding people participating in, the images of them are fainted. Policies made by these departments' officials are heading to help people, so knowing what people want is necessary for them to do. If they still want to try something illegal, just like a hospital in China that refused to accept a severe patient because of ridiculous anti-covid-19 policies, it was criticized harshly by the people.

In sum, both making judgment on their own or correctly carry out people's will has advantages and disadvantages. Thus, a more careful thinking should be suggested, and the context or any related situation is also factor under the decision-making way.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'decisions'' or 'decision's'?
Suggestion: decisions'; decision's
...mselves, advantages are relative to the decisions speed and efficiency. For example, when...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 667, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
... of decision-making that has the lowest side-effect. However, for departments serving for p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...own or correctly carry out peoples will has advantages and disadvantages. Thus, a m...
^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'factored'.
Suggestion: factored
...ontext or any related situation is also factor under the decision-making way.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, still, thus, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 307.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40716612378 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2633624903 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592833876221 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3285007673 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.692307692 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202918644282 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802427277035 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837050860826 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148060832632 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559129254394 0.0667264976115 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.