Some people believe that in order to be effective,political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
What qualities of a political leader should be called effective? Opinions are divided into two sides, one is the quality of agreeing with public opinions, and other one is sticking to principals and objectives. In my opinion, I believe the both could account for a great leader, but neither singular is not enough to describe an effective leader.
The first opinion, the true idea is that the effective leaders should listen to citizens, to hear from their needs, in order to purposefully act on policies aiming to solve their problems. In this interpretion, it is understandable, in that that is what democrocy suits for. Like America, every president candidate has campaigns in states in order to persuade them to vote for him, although it seems pragmatic, it is nevertheless a way to make promises to citizens, such as pricing policies that will be cooled down if he is selected as the president. But in other part of the first claim, saying leaders must yield to public opinions and abandon principles for sake of compromise, is wrong for an objective leader. Because, even though citizens' opinions are important and sign of democrocy, they fail to take a comprehensive view of the whole country issues. In certain requests, they will be beneficial for certain part's citizen but harmful for other part's. Moreover, whether sticking to rules or not is a standard to judge one's persona, compromising to citizens' harmful opinions to gain votes also implies how greater the possibility that those leaders will regret when they already are presidents.
But it does not mean that the second kind of people is fully right, because consistently committing to certain rules brings themselves more impression of stilted. Rules and principles are ruled by peoples with imperfections, indeed, no one is flawless. If some flawed principles obstacle residents lives, they should be abandoned anyway. Recent days, the Roe v. Wade was overrided by the superior court, it sensational to American women. The RvW itself is a classic case that describes leaders change a triditional principle for protecting women's rights. Thus, the second kind of idea has imcompletions as well.
To sum up, neither of the two have enough description of an effective leader, but if we put the two ideas together, it will form a more comprehensive view regarding the question. Effective leaders should yield to public opinions when orthodox is unreasonable, should committed to principles when opinions are unreasonable.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 918, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parts'' or 'part's'?
Suggestion: parts'; part's
...ts, they will be beneficial for certain parts citizen but harmful for other parts. Mo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1027, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... to rules or not is a standard to judge ones persona, compromising to citizens harmf...
^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'principles'' or 'principle's'?
Suggestion: principles'; principle's
...eed, no one is flawless. If some flawed principles obstacle residents lives, they should b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, thus, well, as to, kind of, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16296296296 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90966885393 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565432098765 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1075824723 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.052631579 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411195744168 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107732284597 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103107229598 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237768220455 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835405873831 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 918, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parts'' or 'part's'?
Suggestion: parts'; part's
...ts, they will be beneficial for certain parts citizen but harmful for other parts. Mo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1027, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... to rules or not is a standard to judge ones persona, compromising to citizens harmf...
^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'principles'' or 'principle's'?
Suggestion: principles'; principle's
...eed, no one is flawless. If some flawed principles obstacle residents lives, they should b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, thus, well, as to, kind of, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16296296296 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90966885393 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565432098765 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1075824723 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.052631579 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411195744168 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107732284597 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103107229598 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237768220455 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835405873831 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.