Government should offer free education to anyone who has been admitted to University but cannot afford the tuition.
Government should offer full ride scholarships to the students who manages admission in Universities but does not have the ability to pay for it. The aforementioned system should be in place for Public Universities enforced by the government itself. Beside this, privately owned Universities should also be encouraged to have sufficient funds allocated for the purpose.
Need based scholarship has been in existence for some years now. Universities both public and private have taken various steps to come forward in mitigating the financial problem for students who don’t have the funds required for covering the tuition fee of the course or degree he has been registered in. But the lack of steadfast policies regarding this particularly from the government itself has hampered the process to be in full force.
Government should undertake a multi-level plan to implement the required proposition. Firstly, there should be a thorough survey of the economic condition of each families by the state or city council they are living under. This not only serves the purpose of the proposition that is being discussed but also creates an opportunity for the government to use this data for further projects. Secondly, government should collect the required budget as proposed by each Universities for giving scholarships to under-privileged. With adequate subsidies this can easily be covered from other sectors where financing has been in excess lately. Lastly, due capabilities test should be ensured for the student to get the opportunity.
For the fulfillment of the project, there might be some initial issues for squelching of budget from other sector but with adequate time, once these students become graduates and turn into important human resource for the society they will definitely contribute to the economy much more than imagined. Education indeed should be one of the fundamental rights of human being. If someone is capable enough to undertake higher studies in each step there should not be any factor denying him the chance to do so.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, regarding, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3282208589 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89876002204 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588957055215 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2551675825 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184959616085 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075882964264 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528793547335 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12587714519 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568220713211 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.