government should offer university education to any student that has been admitted but cannot afford the tuition.
The statement asserts that the government should offer free university education to any student who has been admitted to that university and cannot afford the expenses. Clearly, the logic that education should be a top priority and is in fact the most significant factor towards nation’s advancements- socially, technologically, and economically. We observe an interconnected tie of knots between education and rate of development i.e. literacy rate; for example, countries like India, Africa are under-developed and USA, China are developed. In India over the past 10 years policies, schemes and educational programs are suggested concerning the declined literacy rate. I agree it may not be easy but if better funding and programs are lined for students it can create a chain reaction regarding nation’s growth.
Some direct and cogent effects of the government funding deserving students, who cannot afford tuition but are passionate about their education course, their university level education is that a better batch of willing-to-work professionals in fact will graduate from the university. We take ivy league universities like Harvard, Oxford, and their rigorous application procedure, the hell students have to go through to get admissions gives us a hint on how meticulously both university and the students take the norms, what this tells about the university is that they want the most meritorious students and have been one of the top universities around the globe for the same reason.
University is one of the best platforms for social interaction, exchange of ideas and culture. The way diversity of ideology and culture under one roof can affect the growth of a cult is recognized by many universities, and thus universities encourage foreign students to get education in a heterogenous group. Government of Germany, France, and many other countries promote diversity by giving scholarships and minimal university tuition for students, especially to the ones’ that are coming from overseas. This in fact create a better society where there is acceptance of ideas and culture, with intellect admiring minds.
A different angle, a deeper look at this issue is if we suppose the government does not offer higher level education to economically unstable students, the rich might take the seat of this well-deserved student with the power of money and not on merit. This indicates the relationship created between education and money, be it for education or for a job after education. This cannot be right and kept to a minimal mutual dependence. Thus, I believe if government can play a role offering scholarships and help poor students get the higher education they deserve would ripple both moral and economical stature.
In conclusion, I would agree that the government should offer university education to students with poor economical status, but at the same time have a rigorous procedure so to avoid treachery against such a moral offering, also a lot of students cannot be offered such scholarships due to a limited educational budget of the government, but whomsoever the aid has been given has to be justified. An issue can have both pros and cons, what matters is how we solve them and advance forward being better each time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 106, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...versity education to students with poor economical status, but at the same time have a rig...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 514, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...advance forward being better each time.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, regarding, so, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2760.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30769230769 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05123653274 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511538461538 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 888.3 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.5067675141 60.3974514979 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.352941176 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5882352941 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417498960967 0.243740707755 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127226462943 0.0831039109588 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156685485836 0.0758088955206 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22337195456 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662296201334 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.