Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
We human-beings as a community had been evolving through the passage of time, and our intricacies about having a government or a communal leadership to particular people also evolved. As the prompt recommended that governments should only pay attention to their judgments, and remiss the demand or suggestions of their own people. I mostly disagree with this opinion due to several reasons.
To begin with, the governments should be democratic, as for dictatorship/tyrannical governments never listens to their people, only one man runs the whole country with ironhand. Prerequisite to being a democratic country is being elected to be a government official by the very people whose demands are being neglected. As most of the officials are directly elected by the votes of the people, and most of the time these candidates makes a list of demands of the people that they will promise to keep if they are elected. If they renege from that positions, it will engender a group of agitated people. As, most of the countries have large scale protests because of eclectic reasons. If one of the will of the people is demanding, and it is neglected or even worse a different action is taken by the government, it may give rise to protest from the people. As, we can see in USA, from time to time Black people demanded equal justice. The death of George Floyed led to a huge protest on the roads from the citizens of united states of America. And this became a global phenomenon, as this protest spread through Europe rapidly. Another example, in a third world country called Bangladesh, the road safety has been a issue for a decade, as many people die due to accidents which can be prevented. Those primary reasons behind these "accidents" are not having a proper driver's license, the vehicles (mostly buses) are not fit ( they may have engine failure, brakes do not work properly), the drivers themselves are ignorant about the traffic rules, etc. The death of two school children led to a nationwide protest that was led by the middle schoolers. They came on to the street and protested for about two weeks street. As we can imply from these examples, it is necessary to address the peoples' demands in due time else huge outbreaks are common.
Additionally, these government officials are chosen by the people. Their goal should be having a country with happy citizens. For example, the country Bhutan does have a King, but is a democratic country. And they have a scale called happiness per capita, and the reign of their government officials are mesaured by happiness per capita. This country is the one of the two countries in the world to be a carbon negative country. Not only that, it has a seventy percent of forest with respect to its whole area which is quite remarkable. Their government officials and king are revered by their people, as the country is not only making a good example to the whole world for its climate awareness but also the demands of their citizens are met.
However, sometimes carrying out the will of the people may lead to terrible results. It's not safe to say that when most people opinion towards a particular problem is good. As in USA, there are people who supports racisim, and this is not at all good.
In conclusion, Government officials should have a amalgamation approach towards its problems, as they should incorporate their own judgements with the will of the people
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1215, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ed Bangladesh, the road safety has been a issue for a decade, as many people die ...
^
Line 3, column 1432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, the vehicles mostly buses are not fit they may have engine failure, brakes do ...
^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...usion, Government officials should have a amalgamation approach towards its probl...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, third, as for, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2841.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 585.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85641025641 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9180050066 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80259525114 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451282051282 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 892.8 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3975555396 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.464285714 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8928571429 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250191339657 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703684475457 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764925812638 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182332364269 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751799909976 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.