Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It goes without saying that during history, mankind has always preoccupied with finding a way to balance out the degree of governments' authorities and public will. In this regard, there is no clear answer to this dilemma that whether officials should rely on their own judgments or unquestioningly carry out the will of people.However, I, personally, think that it is better for governments to rely on their own judgments rather than make decision based on people's will.
First, government officials are more knowledgable than the public. There are innumerable issues in nation that need deep knowledge to be solved. Government officials have enough information about the context of national matters which helps them to make wise decisions. Consider a situation in which the government should take pressing action to relieve economic crisis in the country, and This plan consists of increasing tax. For planning policies and implementing effective economical strategies, one should have sufficient knowledge about various fields such as economy, politics, sociology and even international relationship. Government officials are only people who are egligible enough to make reliable judgments about these critical themes. On the other hand, maybe people,due to their lack of information, prefer to pay lower taxes than before, and probably will offend this policy. However, the only way for the country to survive in such a crisis is to increase tax. If the government rely on will of people, the country's economy will soon be exasperated.
Second, government officials can make more impartial and rationale judgments in comparison with ordinary people. It is clear that nowadays, people are exposed to a wide range of news from all corners of the globe. All of us hear and read many good and bad news about various subjects every day, but a question arises here that what percent of these news are true? Moreover, as the history shows us, there are always different parties in society that do not completely advocate of governments.Hence, it is possible that these adverse cliques release rumorses and falsified statements. By doing so, people are exposed to either false news or biased rumorse. Besides, ordinary people may become hystric and emotinal about current situation of their country, and make decisions emotionally. In contrast, government officials are not affected by false news and emotions, so their judgments will be more rationale than those of public.
However, to pay attention to will of people is a significant sign of each democrate society. If government officials rely on their own wills without paying attention to will of people, they will soon be exposed to dissaified people who commit riots. Besides, in a nation in which all judgments and decisions are in the hands of government officials, the possiblity of vices and venals among officials is more than democrate societes.
In conclusion, governments should rely mostly on their own judgments since people are not informed enough to make effective decisions and aslo people are exposed to fale statements and are more emotional than officials which prevent them to make reasonable and objective judgments. Yet,simoltanousely, governments must pay attention to people's preferrences and form a democrate society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 328, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...stioningly carry out the will of people.However, I, personally, think that it is better...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 669, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...p. Government officials are only people who are egligible enough to make reliable judgm...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 781, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , due
... themes. On the other hand, maybe people,due to their lack of information, prefer to...
^^^^
Line 6, column 344, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'these newses'?
Suggestion: this news; these newses
...estion arises here that what percent of these news are true? Moreover, as the history show...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 493, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
... not completely advocate of governments.Hence, it is possible that these adverse cliq...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 286, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , simoltanousely
... reasonable and objective judgments. Yet,simoltanousely, governments must pay attention to peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2791.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 518.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38803088803 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94471413951 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490347490347 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 873.0 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6455506346 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.347826087 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5217391304 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30434782609 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30894954245 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889054339141 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783470278808 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20447138122 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671427804588 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.