Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y

Essay topics:

Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

There are diverse sets of problems attacking the globe either in immediate vicinity or in the long run that governments should deal everyday. Each government have their own sets of policies and tactics to deal with those problems. The author raise that issue that whether a government should focus on the immediate and exigent problems or should rather focus on problems that are anticipated in future. I mostly disagree with the authors assertion for two reasons mentioned below and rather argue that government should focus on the anticipated in future. However, i do concede that ,in some cases, immediate problems that need immediate attention of government should be taken care of.
To embark, with the world passing the phase of industrial revolution and currently at the hands of corporate businesses, the problem of pollution accumulated by industries are exacerbated to next level. The problem of climate change is strongly associated with the problem of pollution and carelessness of people. Although these problems may seem to be at the control and some drastic effects is not seen yet, governments all around the world are nonchalance about the risk it poses for future generations. The assertion that the earth will not be habitable in 50 years is potentially true, if the rate of pollution and global warming continues at the same pace. Governments should thus put efforts to eradicate these problems and pave a path of sustainability for upcoming generations. Is is justifiable to reap off all the natural resources and to destroy the habitat for future generation?
Secondly, problems that are expected to hit hard in future are generally viewed as neglegient by most governments and have incurred severe costs for that neglegience. Foe instant; Locust attack in Nepal in 1993, which destroyed nearly 60% of the country's food was because of the government inability to take actions at appropriate time. Had they devised some strategies beforehand that problem could have been solved with ease.
Thirdly, governments in their efforts to solve problems anticipated, that can potentially happen in future, should not completely blindfold themselves of the problems in front of their sight. For instance; Covid-19 pandemic that hit the world very hard in 2020, if not given due care by government can result to some great problems at instant. Governments, in an attempt to tackle with anticipated problems should not remain nonchalant in cases like these.
In conclusion, problems, immediate problems and anticipated problems, are both that should be dealt by government and are complex topic to take a side. But when to take a side and deal with, i mostly disagree with the issues presents and argue that government should rather focus on long term problems rather than anticipated problems for future.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e long run that governments should deal everyday. Each government have their own sets of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'raises'.
Suggestion: raises
...to deal with those problems. The author raise that issue that whether a government sh...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 393, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... focus on problems that are anticipated in future. I mostly disagree with the authors ass...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...d in future. I mostly disagree with the authors assertion for two reasons mentioned bel...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 546, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ernment should focus on the anticipated in future. However, i do concede that ,in some ca...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 566, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... on the anticipated in future. However, i do concede that ,in some cases, immedia...
^
Line 1, column 583, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ed in future. However, i do concede that ,in some cases, immediate problems that n...
^^
Line 2, column 787, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Is
...ustainability for upcoming generations. Is is justifiable to reap off all the natural...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nticipated, that can potentially happen in future, should not completely blindfold themse...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2367.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22516556291 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82471529802 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503311258278 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5847547795 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.578947368 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8421052632 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350385158481 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119420777127 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750150387683 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212414429813 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628452934744 0.0667264976115 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.