Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Some problems might be okay to be tackled later in the future, while some problems need to be solved immediately. Whether the government choose to focus on the immediate tasks or decide to handle with further problems, I believe that whatever choice governments make, they should keep in mind that it can have great impact on the society. However, to be more clear on where I stand, I should say that it is more wise for the government to concentrate on solving the problems that are happening now rather than wasting their effort on the problems of the future. The reasons for why I maintain in such way would be discussed with further detail below.
First of all, we do not know how the world would change. Right now, it might seem like several symptoms might seem ominous and would lead to depressing results. However, the way people think, the way people act and behave, or the way nature changes can vary in many ways and is unclear how it would turn out. For example, currently, Covid-19 is a phenomenal pandemic and many people are dying due to this disease. Many medical professionals advised the government to instantly shut down the country and promulgate a policy of citizens to no longer go out of their houses. However, only being concerned about the economic crisis that can happen if people cannot go out and do social activities, governments did not take the advice and instead, handed out discount coupons which can be used in grocery stores. They decided to solve problems that can happen in the future instead of tackling the current problem and due to this decision, many people are now currently suffering from this disease.
Some people might claim that sometimes it is important to see the big picture which could be problems that can occur in the future in this case, instead of being peripheral. I do agree to this claim in certain degree because sometimes solving the big problem can eliminate the small problems that are currently happening. However, I think the order of solving problems is also very important. Some cases might be germane to be handled as mentioned above, but some cases need to handled starting from the marginal problems and move on to bigger ones.
To sum up, even though some people could claim that it is better for the government to focus on problems that can happen in the future instead of focusing on current problems because this can eradicate problems that are currently happening, I should gainsay this claim. I believe it is better for the government to start with solving current problems due to the reasons I have mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 73
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 73
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice for a client Most homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last heating season that regi 69
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some problems might be okay to be tackle...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e discussed with further detail below. First of all, we do not know how the wor...
^^
Line 2, column 953, Rule ID: NOW_CURRENTLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'now'.
Suggestion: now
...d due to this decision, many people are now currently suffering from this disease. Some pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...currently suffering from this disease. Some people might claim that sometimes i...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l problems and move on to bigger ones. To sum up, even though some people could...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, i think, first of all, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77951002227 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4524182122 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469933184855 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0998802685 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.235294118 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4117647059 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228011840055 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828888575375 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656478228605 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164159284227 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586936866976 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.