Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Implementing a long-term governmental plan before taking practical approaches is crucial - launching 10-year or 20-year sustainable goals - due to its necessity in evaluating general approaches when dealing with long term goals in various fields. In any given circumstance and time, there are issues that are crucial but yet unlikely to be solved in short terms, such as urban designing, environmental disasters, and regulating or controlling the overall population. Although, it is imperative to solve immediate problems of today, as it is stated in the prompt, dealing with sustainable goals requires as much attention as the former in order to manage a sound and stable community. In this essay, I will clarify the point by providing several reasons and examples.
Firstly, even though emergent problems that ask for prompt response should be dealt with primary attention, the most preferable type of governmental approach is to accurately predict the various forms and types of anticipated problems and prevent them beforehands. Admittedly, the immediacy of current issues should not be overlooked. For example, outbreaks of epidemic diseases such as the current spread of COVID-19 require practical approaches in order to alleviate the seriousness. Mask supplies should be held punctually in time, before the contagion spreads throughout the whole community. Also, funding and implementing fervous research in vaccination should also be crucial. As such problems call for serious attention, governmental institutions shall have the responsibility to bring the society back to order. However, what if the problem had been prevented before the actual incident? What if the medical research team were capable enough to measure factors that might influence the harmfulness of the virus? Then the whole community wouldn’t have been even involved in the issue and citizens might have been able to sustain a quality life. As a well known aphorism tells us that ‘an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure,’ governments are required to call up as much as resources in order to execute innovative measurements in dealing with future problems, so that the upcoming ‘present’ issues can be always taken into control.
Secondly, anticipated problems are crucial, due to the simple fact that the division between immediate problems and anticipated problems are most of the time fluid and flexible. The once anticipated issues shall at once become current ones as historical examples have shown us. For instance, the ongoing global warming and climate change was, for a long period of time, regarded as future problems. Simply take a glance at the word ‘warming’ in global warming, and we’ll be immediately surprised by the moderate nuance of the term. Severe environmental changes were anticipated for approximately half a century by climate researchers and environmentalists, but as Greta Thunberg articulated in a simple word “How dare!,”only a handful of actions have been taken, which led to the current catastrophe. Thus, unlike the statement’s premise that there is a clear cut division of present and future, anticipated issues gradually and eventually become current problems which require keen attention and participation.
In conclusion, the essay emphasized two main reasons why it is important to take care of the anticipated problems as well as the current problems. First, taking actions in terms of achieving sustainable goals and preventing potential incidents allow us to maintain current life without critical disorder or social loss. Second, the dichotomy of present and future, now and then is likely to exacerbate social problems. Therefore, most importantly, a balanced viewpoint on both immediate and anticipated issues is required in order to manage a stable society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e taking practical approaches is crucial - launching 10-year or 20-year sustainab...
^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ming and climate change was, for a long period of time, regarded as future problems. Simply ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 721, Rule ID: NO_SPACE_CLOSING_QUOTE[1]
Message: There should be a space after a closing quote.
Suggestion: ” only
...articulated in a simple word “How dare!,”only a handful of actions have been taken, w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3230.0 2235.4752809 144% => OK
No of words: 586.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51194539249 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92010537223 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06135298294 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 313.0 215.323595506 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534129692833 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 1002.6 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7434909114 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.583333333 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212577355734 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056207166418 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660957676349 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120369091952 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308823843555 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 170.0 100.480337079 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.8971910112 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.