Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.
In today's modern era, two aspects, the art and military have been very important for any particular nation. Military provides the tight security needed to maintain peace and it militates against the anti national species. On the other hand, the art is equally important as it shows the diversity a country has and skills of people within the nation. The statement contends that government should spend as much in the arts as they do in the military. I totally agree with the assertion and firmly believe that government must spend fund in the arts but then again not at the cost of compromising with the fund of military.
To begin with, the art of any nation represents the culture that nation possesses and having said that it the heredity of our ancestors we all must preserve it. Moreover, by preserving it only we can teach the value of the art to next generation. Therefore, government should do all it can to maintain the art. Apart from that government can earn income by making it a tourist place and this way it can help to increase the value of a particular nation in whole world.
Secondly, the art can be a source of income as the government can organize the art exhibition. It would help in two ways. First, it would help the makers of art to earn income and this way he can be motivated to make more art and second it would help the lovers of art to get what they want. Under such circumstances, the government can organize art exhibition and can open art gallery by funding the money and it would ultimately help the whole society as well as government as they will get the money too.
Thirdly, nowadays what happens is there are so many talented artists available in society but they are not getting the help they needed from government, in such circumstances if government be benevolent and help them by funding money then it will ultimately help so many people. For example, if we take music concerts then there are so many other people working with artist like manager, organizer etc. and this way it helps in providing others too a decent job.
On the other hand, one can never neglect the fact that military of any nation would always remain on the top of the table as they work out of their skins to protect any nation and they do not compromise the security of any nation at any cost. Under such circumstances, the government must spend the amount of money needed in protecting the the nation and they must do all it can to provide the better equipment with the latest technology to the military.
In my final analysis, I conclude that in order to maintain culture and in order to entertain people and to have tourist places that can increase the value of any nation at the global level, the government should do all it can to spread awareness about art. Then at the same time, having said that its the question of billions of people living in a nation, the government should never compromise with its military funding at any cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Under such circumstances, the government must spend the amount of money needed in...
^^
Line 9, column 338, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...he amount of money needed in protecting the the nation and they must do all it can to p...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 338, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...he amount of money needed in protecting the the nation and they must do all it can to p...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 298, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...Then at the same time, having said that its the question of billions of people livi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, apart from, for example, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2440.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 531.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59510357815 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48119029996 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.408662900188 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 771.3 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5325106893 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.55 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308474967076 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120234259708 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145711700814 0.0758088955206 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171695273676 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736483571227 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.