The author recommends that the government should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. I disagree entirely with the author's recommendation because scientific research is an essential segment for the country's scientific and social development. I will delineate why the author's advice is mendacious.
Firstly, scientific research is the method with which a country can showcase its true potential to be on the top of any research-related activities. The money which the government gets from taxpayers is increasing year on year. The government should fund those scientific research-related activities, which will help the country to attain a better position on leader-board compared to other countries who are on the same research-related activities. For example, India's space research organization, Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), which examined its first-ever space flight mission to moons southern part. Though this program was not 100% successful, it proved to be quite useful for Indian scientists to learn from their mistakes. Only because of this space program, India attained its position among the top 3 countries who have completed their flight to the moon.
Moreover, if the government would not have invested in this project, it would not have been possible for India to attain such a respectable position among highly technologically advanced countries. Therefore, the government needs to invest in such kind of projects so that, when the younger generation ought to start some big projects, they don't get dejected by the thought that my research would be profitable for the country or I am too optimistic about my research project.
However, the authors' recommendation might be valid in some cases if the evaluation of the project concludes that they should not invest in scientific research. The first thing the government thought was to save Money, Time, and Human effort that will be involved while making progress on scientific research. Their thinking is true to a great extent if the involved project creates no development for humans as a whole.
To sum up, Scientific research is essential for a country's growth and to attain a respectable position among other countries. Hence, the government should fund scientific research though the consequences are unclear
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e unclear. I disagree entirely with the authors recommendation because scientific resea...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...l development. I will delineate why the authors advice is mendacious. Firstly, scie...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... ought to start some big projects, they dont get dejected by the thought that my res...
^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...t my research project. However, the authors recommendation might be valid in some c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, kind of, in some cases, to sum up, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49025069638 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09131716336 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515320334262 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5547325173 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.1875 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.21951772744 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2661505725 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108321085896 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912839205993 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168615623089 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684954508791 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.