Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research are very important part of any country to develop their scientific value as well as position in front of other country. The prompt states that, Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. The Scientific research fund is required for country and I strongly disagree with the given prompt. I will states my view in two points.
To begin, Every country in the world want to be prominent in term of science, Technology, Finance and other overall development. So because of this government of country should give the fund for scientific research and give new direction to the country development. If we take an example of USA, the country who are always on top to scientific research fund allocation. Because of this USA is command over other country in term of Aerospace. Their NASA aerospace research firm is always top in Aerospace activity. Author said that, government should cut if firm not able to perform well but if the research firm did not get success is that not like they are wasting countries fund. They are giving their best to perform well. Some time they get success some time they get failure.
Additionally, Other than USA, India in twentieth century their scientific research firm is not well develop but they try many times to get success and now India is the first country to successfully done Mars mission in first try. From this example, we can illustrate that, research required money for try the new innovation they want to try.
In conclusion, the author is stating very wrong recommendation and country should always encourage such type of firm to develop new technology to enhance the development of country as well as world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | shahajan999 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-29 | seoul_milk | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | sark | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | cringelord | 79 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | cringelord | 45 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
- Teachers salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 58
- Back Write a response in which you deliberate on the kind of questions that need answers before deciding whether the suggestion and the supporting argument are practical Be certain to clarify how the answers to these questions would aid in assessing the t 16
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten year budget for the city of Calatrava The birthrate in our city is declining in fact last year s birthrate was only one half that of five years ago Thus the number of students enroll 55
- The vice president of human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company s president In an effort to improve our employees productivity we should implement electronic monitoring of employees Internet use from their wor
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'state'
Suggestion: state
... disagree with the given prompt. I will states my view in two points. To begin,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will states my view in two points. To begin, Every country in the world wan...
^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to scientific research fund allocation. Because of this USA is command over other coun...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fund allocation. Because of this USA is command over other country in term of Ae...
^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aerospace research firm is always top in Aerospace activity. Author said that, go...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et success some time they get failure. Additionally, Other than USA, India ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...at, research required money for try the new innovation they want to try. In conclusion,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the new innovation they want to try. In conclusion, the author is stating ver...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 287.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98954703833 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68186322191 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477351916376 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5630054754 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4666666667 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174474335853 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734724269959 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808912259206 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123329009025 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853827530683 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.