Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Educational institutions are one of the utmost and critical part of a student’s life. To meet the growing demands of education and ever increasing number of students along with economic inflation, the cost of institutions have also gone quite high. This makes the situation more complicated for students who have lower socioeconomic status. They have to make a choice between attending the university and piling up loans which they might spent their whole life paying back. Or to not attend the university at all even after qualifying with merit leading to the waste of a potential talent. Naturally, public will demand justice and equality for the unfortunate and the government will have to address the issue.
The purpose of the above statement is to bridge the discussion of how the government could step in to resolve the situation. They could provide funding to assist the students in need of financial help. Not only this policy helps in increasing the socioeconomic status of lower class people it also increases the overall literacy of the nation and maintain higher threshold of talent in the university. To further illustrate my point, take the example of Kerela, a relatively poor state in the 20th century had rose to become a distinguished state in India over last decade. It has now hundred percent literacy thanks to its state government giving full financial aid to any student in need and promoting educational programs and exhibits all across the state. The government have now become a icon of what a ideal democratic rule looks like and have also produced multiple talents in various fields of science and technology in the last decade.
However, any system could be exploited and this holds true for this one too. A university is also a profit-seeking corporation. Getting funded by government may incite a institute to seek even more students to capitalize on the policy and make more money. This could lead to overwhelming amount of students which the institute might neither have the required number of faculty for nor the proper amount of resources. This could lead to declination in quality of education which is just polar to what the policy was made for. Students, too, might be tempted to provide misleading or fraudulent information in hopes of getting scholarship in order to get free university education. Since the government could also not provide unlimited resources, this might lead to retracting the policy bringing everything to square one.
This leads to the dilemma of weighing the positive consequences with the negative and determining if the advantages is worth the risk of the loss. One possible solution may be that government should provide only limited amount of scholarship based on student’s need and it should be regulated by a third party to keep check on the respective student’s and the university’s background. This is to make sure no one could exploit the structure unrelentlessly so that the quality of the education could be maintained.
In conclusion, the policy in its bare bones format might be devastating to both the student and the government in future. The scarce government resources must be utilized in regulation and with proper screening of the affected parties such that exploitation is kept to bare minimum. Thus, the policy must be reviewed to achieve maximum benefit from it in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | KarinaShine | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | stevewang1007 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 66
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 81
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 55
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 66
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 792, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e state. The government have now become a icon of what a ideal democratic rule lo...
^
Line 3, column 807, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...vernment have now become a icon of what a ideal democratic rule looks like and ha...
^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for this one too. A university is also a profit-seeking corporation. Getting fund...
^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...Getting funded by government may incite a institute to seek even more students to...
^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... to both the student and the government in future. The scarce government resources must b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, so, third, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2844.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 555.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12432432432 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85370353223 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92990591538 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506306306306 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 912.6 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.160181159 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.76 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179645220136 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494489874581 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038072418827 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976727649907 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353254177033 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.