Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It is said that whether or not governments should put few restrictions on scientific projects. I believe that the amount of restrictions depend on the type of researches should be different.
On the one hand I believe that the interference of government on some scientific projects which are morally wrong is necessary and such scientific plans must be banned. One of these projects is testing on animals. I strongly disagree with such research, as I believe that animals are the creatures of God and have this right to live. It is morally wrong scientists use them in order to test the credibility and effectiveness of products which are supposed to be used by humans. For example, animal testing on cosmetics or other nonmedical products. In this situation, the limits imposed by government are necessary, and officials have to encourage people to use the products which are not examined on animals. Also, such project must not be subsidized by state budget.
However, as there is no suitable alternative instead of animals for medical projects, some of the scientific tests on animals for medical progressions can be justifiable. I believe that for treatment of some curable diseases or even incurable, scientists have no choice but to select animals for testing of effectiveness of drugs. This is because in this way they can find some solutions to treat ill people as soon as possible. For instance, many useful vaccines used by people are as a result of animal examination. Do people use a vaccine that has not been tested? Absolutely not. If medical remedies had not been tested, people would have not satisfied to use them and the illnesses would have spread widely. In this condition, governments need to support scientific plans related to medicine, but they also have to set some reasonable rules for such projects so that no one can misuse them.
Also, I believe that strong restrictions are necessary for scientific projects which can threaten the lives of people, such as the creation of nuclear weapons. This is because such products can be used by corrupt officials who want to have the power and they do not consider the negative consequences of such products. Like the use of chemical bombs in Hiroshima that yet many people suffer from the irreparable outcomes resulted by such bombs.
However, the officials must not interfere on scientific projects which can help people to have better life. For example, the projects related to the creation of satellite internet for unlimited access so that no one can interrupt it. In some country like Iran, because officials tend to censor some important news and not to let people know about the facts, as a result they filter most of social networks. If officials in overseas let their technical specialists to provide satellite networks in the world, no one can limit the access of the internet and all people can know about the truth and the events around them. They can easily use the internet in right way to progress their lives. In such project the interference of officials must be ignored.
In conclusion, in my view, based on the kind of the project the amount of restrictions from government should be respected and considered.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
It is said that whether or not governments should put few restrictions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nstead of animals for medical projects, some of the scientific tests on animals for medical...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 596, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding events'?
Suggestion: the surrounding events
...all people can know about the truth and the events around them. They can easily use the internet in ri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2669.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 537.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97020484171 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77879039278 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.422718808194 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 846.0 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5896001789 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.653846154 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6538461538 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26923076923 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110174166836 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038665244695 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434150584674 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080807244645 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450002022505 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.