Some people believe today that everyone has a right to access to the Internet and that governments should provide this access for free Other people believe that access to the internet is not a right and should be paid for like other services Discuss both

Essay topics:

Some people believe today that everyone has a right to access to the Internet and that governments should provide this access for free. Other people believe that access to the internet is not a right and should be paid for like other services. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

People have different views on whether or not internet access should be free. I believe that individuals have to pay for internet services like other media, such as phone, televion and newspaper.
Before the introduction of the internet, people had no choice but to use phone for calling, newspaper and television for getting news about different events. However, modern life depends on the internet so that all activities are done over it, from making connections with social media, such as Skype, Meet and Imo to getting news from Instagram, Telegram and YouTube. In the past, people had to pay for phone calls and newspapers, so the question is that why some people believe that accessing the internet should be free. Like other all media, accessing to the internet is costly, from the storing the information to passing it to users.
We have to consider that If officials want to make the internet free, they must use the state budget which can be used for improvement of necessary public services, including road safety, construction of well-equipped hospitals and schools. The only benefit of public internet can be the warranty of equal access of all people to the internet. This can be an invaluable activity in order to increase the knowledge of individuals by providing a space in which people can equally learn, grow and make informed decisions. But what percentage of people really use such a service? Individuals who really need to use the internet will be willing to pay for it. Therefore, providing free internet is waste of money. Additionally, such an internet service not only is unreliable but also is slow especially when multiple users have access to the internet simultaneously. Moreover, in this condition some hackers can misuse the free internet to hack the information of users because of the weak condition of security in the virtual space. As a result, having the free internet is not reasonable.
In conclusion, in my view, people have to pay for using the internet, as the money raised can help governments to provide more facilities for keeping virtual space safe. Also, this money can be a good aid for the state budget for providing important public services.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have different views on whether or not internet access should be free. I belie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oviding important public services.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0218579235 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74802544081 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505464480874 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0884192173 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.117647059 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426257323632 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161960333765 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942316438729 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300837055345 0.151304729494 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763095146725 0.056905535591 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have different views on whether or not internet access should be free. I belie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oviding important public services.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0218579235 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74802544081 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505464480874 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0884192173 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.117647059 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426257323632 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161960333765 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942316438729 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300837055345 0.151304729494 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763095146725 0.056905535591 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.