Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop

Essay topics:

Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Scientific research and development is crucial for the advancement of the current generation towards a more sustainable and futuristic style of living. Research and development helps venture into uncharted waters, which occasionally results in a fruitful discovery. The given statement suggests that governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research or discovery. I disagree with such a statement on the grounds that research and development should be done without outside interference. Failing to ensure outside hindrance can cause the research to loose it true essence. The following paragraphs would elaborate more upon my position and the reasoning behind it.

Often times governments of different nations bring about propaganda and cultural ideologies that stand in the way of a ground-breaking research. For example, cultural groups in India oppose domains of potential research on the grounds that it is a cultural taboo. Such beliefs can crop up in the minds of those who run the nation as well. As a result, the government would promote research and developments that appease them where as put restrictions on research that does not hold monetary value for them even if such a research would help ease the predicament of the masses. Scientific research should be bias-free but achieving such a feet with government restrictions is not possible.

Moreover, if restrictions are put upon certain research domains, the domain experts would have to move towards a different line of research, one which they are not proficient in. This would mean that we are wasting a talent from being fully utilized. Say for example, a researcher with expertise in chemical engineering is told to shift departments and pursue research in quantum physics, since there are restrictions on the field chemical engineering that he wishes to pursue. Such restrictions hold back a researcher from applying his true expertise in a field that interests him. It is widely regarded that motivation and interest towards the domain of your choice gives an added impetus to work harder and earn fruitful results.

Proponents of the given statement would claim that certain restrictions need to be put in place to ensure that a research does not fall into wrong hands. For example, there are restrictions on biological modifications of genes and the research a person can do in this domain. I agree that certain restrictions are necessary. Although, it is also important that these restrictions do not impede a possible breakthrough research. There is a fine boundary between restrictions and allowable research and one should be mindful that they do not cross this boundary.

In sum, I am still against the statement that governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research or discovery. Doing so would invariably stand in the way of a possible life-saving research and impede the normal functioning of the scientific society.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 574, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ide hindrance can cause the research to loose it true essence. The following paragrap...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 583, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...ance can cause the research to loose it true essence. The following paragraphs would...
^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...arch and developments that appease them where as put restrictions on research that does ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a foot' or simply 'feet'?
Suggestion: a foot; feet
... should be bias-free but achieving such a feet with government restrictions is not pos...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: FOOT_FEET[1]
Message: 'foot' is the singular form of 'feet'. Consider using 'foot'?
Suggestion: foot
...hould be bias-free but achieving such a feet with government restrictions is not pos...
^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
... need to be put in place to ensure that a research does not fall into wrong hands. For exa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hat certain restrictions are necessary. Although, it is also important that these restri...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, well, for example, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2493.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 467.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33832976445 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04035043547 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47965738758 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6507881297 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.391304348 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3043478261 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.86956521739 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255564768471 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823907839021 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556930382814 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158732334825 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558741253712 0.0667264976115 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.