Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Although I agree with the recommendation that governments should not place restrictions on most of the domains in scientific research, there are a few topics that deal with noxious substances which need to be restricted.
The freedom to choose what to research on is crucial for scientists to have promising contribution since their creativity should not be suppressed by any regulations. If the government only allows their scientists to focus on several fields that could be beneficial to the nation in the leader's view, those researchers could only work on some well-developed domains and doesn't have the permission to create new knowledge. For example, if the government only agrees with the research on making more deadly weapons to defend itself, there could not be the Internet that gives us such a convenient society.
The progress in scientific development could be hampered by any forms of restrictions. For example, the government could regulate the standard process of conducting an experiment that is quite time-consuming. As a result, the scientists would have to wait for five months in order to get the permission from the supervisors. Meanwhile, the other nation doesn't restrict the experiment to any certain form and leave the room for the researchers. Therefore, they could have their results of the same experiment in only two months and continue to improve it.
However, there are some harmful substances in the lab that should be used under some constraints. For example, some scientists are doing research on the behavior of deadly virus. If those virus can be used without any restriction, it possible that some researches accidentally release those virus and harm the citizens. The other example could be the case of nuclear weapons. If there is no restrictions on developing those dangerous weapons, people all over the world could be under the threaten of such powerful weapons.
I think that in most cases, the government should not interfere the scientists. Nevertheless, the research conducted on some special topics needs to be put under constraints in order to prevent any unpredictable disasters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...work on some well-developed domains and doesnt have the permission to create new knowl...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat gives us such a convenient society. The progress in scientific development c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...upervisors. Meanwhile, the other nation doesnt restrict the experiment to any certain ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this virus' or 'those viruses'?
Suggestion: this virus; those viruses
...rch on the behavior of deadly virus. If those virus can be used without any restriction, it...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this virus' or 'those viruses'?
Suggestion: this virus; those viruses
...at some researches accidentally release those virus and harm the citizens. The other exampl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no restrictions'?
Suggestion: there are no restrictions
...ould be the case of nuclear weapons. If there is no restrictions on developing those dangerous weapons, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 485, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eople all over the world could be under the threaten of such powerful weapons. I think t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 341.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28152492669 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03219850535 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507331378299 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.48892478 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5625 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29783832451 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945157883979 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810633307856 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180797768266 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782898047851 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.