Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
I agree that by taking the students recommendation into account, the once tedious courses could be more interesting to students. However, I think there are some courses that aren't easy to adopt what students want.
The students can have more motivations when taking a course that they are interested in. By adopting the suggestions of students, a teacher can make his lecture more interesting and attractive. For example, professor Hung-Yi, Lee does an excellent job on teaching the machine learning, one of the hottest topic in computer science right now. What he does is that he used various interesting examples, such as Pokemons, to elaborate the difficult concepts. It makes many students want to take his courses and really learn a lot of useful knowledge.
Also, the teacher might focus on something that is not up-to-date. Many professors only teach what is important in their own view, which is those things famous when they are still students in colleges. As a result, what they teach could be useless to students because those knowledge are already replaced by some advanced one. For example, some professors in the department of computer science still think that students should be required to implement a compiler, which is a basic program of a computer. Yet, people merely deal with that after graduation. Therefore, learning such a thing could be a waste of time.
However, not every lecture can easily adopt what students want. I think that although motivating students to learn is crucial, the essence of the lecture should not be compromised. For example, the teacher of courses such as calculus and linear algebra could not find a good way to combine students' interest into the lecture. If teachers are required to take every suggestions of students into account, including using cartoon characters to make some toy examples. Students could barely learn a thing after the courses.
I think that teachers should make their best efforts to take the students' interests and suggestions in to account. However, if it is too hard to combine the courses with those recommendations, it is not required to do so since the essence of the lecture should not be compromised.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
I agree that by taking the students recommendation into account, the once t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...er, I think there are some courses that arent easy to adopt what students want. Th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'those knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; those knowledges
...ch could be useless to students because those knowledge are already replaced by some advanced o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, really, so, still, therefore, for example, i think, of course, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07756232687 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75077481305 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479224376731 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5935786717 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.65 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416317421381 0.243740707755 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134988078864 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114823904252 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254125503232 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473197447903 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.