The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Greatness is neither a measure nor a quantity that can be measured. Greatness of a individual lies in achievements and struggle for achiving it.Greatness is some times said to be proportional to number of people benifitted or the fame achieved. But this contradicts the situation when a individual is great by his actions and does not get fame, then the individual is considered a common.It is not the people who decide greatness but the act of the individual who is comitted to to a great thing.
But to a contrast, if we want to know the greatness of the person only by people, excluding myriad of other factors then it may be the contemporaries who can atleast for some extent be knowledgeable about the effort behind the greatness.
Firstly, contemporaries may be erroneous about the view of the great man but they are the proofs of his action towards the achievement. Contemporaries have castigated galileo for his discoveries but they are also the proof of his suffering to make those discoveries. This day we are able to support galileo for his discovery because some one contemporary to him have written about his achievement and suffering he bared to stick to the truth. Whether the discoveries may be true or not the greatness lies in sticking to what he believed. So it is the contemporaries who should first notice the greatness, only then it will be passed to next generations.
Secondly, contemporaries are the people who live in the same situation are at least see the same development. So they can understand the situation accurately. Napoleon, for an instant, may not look much like a strategist, By seeing the wars he waged by marching the soldiers forward into the lines against cannons and enemy guns. But it was the same practiced all around the contemporary world of napoleon. So it is apt for the guns available, slow rate of fire of the weapon. So greatness of nepoleon this days can be seen as good stratagist with out supporting him to be a good battle field stratagist, He can only be praised completly for his achievements and hole heartedly either opposed or supported by his contemporaries.
Contemporaries can also be considered as person competing for the same position and same comodity. So if a person is praised by a contemporary then it would bea great achivement. As greatness does not lie in tales of glory but in the sacrifice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tity that can be measured. Greatness of a individual lies in achievements and str...
^
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Greatness
...hievements and struggle for achiving it.Greatness is some times said to be proportional t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hievements and struggle for achiving it.Greatness is some times said to be proportional t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...But this contradicts the situation when a individual is great by his actions and ...
^
Line 1, column 389, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...n the individual is considered a common.It is not the people who decide greatness ...
^^
Line 1, column 477, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...e act of the individual who is comitted to to a great thing. But to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who is comitted to to a great thing. But to a contrast, if we want to know th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...of the weapon. So greatness of nepoleon this days can be seen as good stratagist wit...
^^^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...his days can be seen as good stratagist with out supporting him to be a good battle fiel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or the same position and same comodity. So if a person is praised by a contemporary t...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'at least']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217889908257 0.240241500013 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.172018348624 0.157235817809 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0619266055046 0.0880659088768 70% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0504587155963 0.0497285424764 101% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0573394495413 0.0444667217837 129% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.121559633028 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.045871559633 0.0406280797675 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.10094930684 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0321100917431 0.030933414821 104% => OK
Particles: 0.00229357798165 0.0016655270985 138% => OK
Determiners: 0.126146788991 0.0997080785238 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0298165137615 0.0249443105267 120% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0183486238532 0.0148568991511 124% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2387.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 407.0 452.878318584 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86486486486 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.307125307125 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.250614250614 0.280924506359 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201474201474 0.200843997647 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.174447174447 0.132149295362 132% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10094930684 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 219.290929204 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479115479115 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 52.0158429464 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.6111111111 23.380412469 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9044425512 59.4972553346 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.611111111 141.124799967 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 23.380412469 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.21349557522 192% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 47.6725361725 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.37704918033 1.64882698954 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443349872279 0.391690518653 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.155761699651 0.123202303941 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0957162544452 0.077325440228 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.556693233205 0.547984918172 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155795661358 0.149214159877 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191869899759 0.161403998019 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780980074645 0.0892212321368 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.454361942438 0.385218514788 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0548534754361 0.0692045440612 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320350212783 0.275328986314 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588003572931 0.0653680567796 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.