Van Gogh, one of the most extraordinary painter in the world didn’t receive a well-matched reputation until his works are recognized by people who live after him many years later. People cannot help wondering whether ii is true that the excellence of an individual can only be evaluated by the next or future generation. As far as I am concerned, this point may not hold true, since any great piece of work would attract certain group of people regardless of whether he is from a simultaneous era or the following period.
To start with, we do have a lot of cases of artists who lived a miserable life throughout their life-long perseverance of aesthetics. Their value of their creations was underwritten by their contemporaries. However, the history didn’t tell us if there use to be an admirer of their masterpiece, who would appreciate their sense of aesthetics. While there is high possibility that the history only records the major view of the contemporaries, leaving behind certain trivial one. Thus, we cannot claim that people living in their same period were not capable of appreciating their greatness.
Moreover, the reason some particular individuals could not receive appropriate recognition is that they were being scandalized and reprimanded due to jealousy of their competing rivals. Those competitors would try every method depreciating their peers in order to obtain popularities from their audiences. Major media inflamed the spread of detrimental comments on these extraordinary artists, which would influence a wider range of people in their period. However, the one who initiated the scandals already realized the attractiveness of their work and would probably create danger to their own popularity. From this point, we cannot deny that people who are able to recognize the beauty of contemporary individuals do exist.
In addition, we are now living in the world enriching in the freedom of conversation. People are relatively more inclined to tolerate any piece of work, since we are now more adept in appreciating objects in multiple angles and aspects. We never lose the chance of criticizing and censuring, meanwhile we could also seek for the value deep down inside its appearance. More rational and objective views are granted by people in modern society, that it allows us the chance to appreciate and consider the excellence of people in current era.
In conclusion, people nowadays would generally divide things into two halves, giving a comment in a more well-rounded and objective manner. It is common that we give appreciation and reward to real masterpieces in our current society. Hence, by saying the value of an individual can only be discovered by people after him is not cogent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 257, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...he history didn't tell us if there use to be an admirer of their masterpiece, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2296.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19457013575 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0093865698 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56334841629 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.898936153 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.8 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155068602477 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511514529708 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367673971822 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856442885662 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445386698537 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.