The prompt suggests that an individual’s influence on others can only be assessed on those that come after them and not others around them at the same time. While it is true that the effect of a persons influence on others may only be seen long after, it is equally as true that in some ways this can be seen instantaneously. That is, at the present time. Two opposite cases can show this.
Firstly the argument does hold true in many instances. That is, the greatness of individuals can certainly be decided by those who come after them. For example, the case of the great Albert Einstein. It is only years after his many contributions that he was actually considered great. At the time of his exiswtence he was merely another physicist performing research as many others. However in the present day he is one of the molst if not the most famous svients ever for his many discoveries. Students are taught of him on all curriculm. Surely this wouldn’t have bben the cae at his time. It took many years to understand and appreciate his contributation to the world and science.
Now in some cases this isn’t the case at all. In fact there are instances where the influence of a person on others can most certainly be seen on others at the time of their existence. Mark Zocherberg, founder of the multi billion dolar worth Facebook and the worlds youngest billionaire at just twenty one cetriangly didn’t have to wait for future generations to understand and declare his greatness. Zucherberg. Facebook founded by Zucherberg, is currently, and has been for the past 10 years the most popular social network used by billions of users worldwide. Surely I would say that reflects and appreciationg of he work and the gratness of Zucherberg.
While there are situation s where the greatness of an individual is determined instantaneously there arre also cases where this is delayed. In some cases the greatness of an idivual is seen and felt by those around them instantaneously as in the case of Mark Zucherberg. While in other cases it takes a while to really
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...hers may only be seen long after, it is equally as true that in some ways this can be seen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ist performing research as many others. However in the present day he is one of the mol...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the youngest'.
Suggestion: worlds the youngest
...ti billion dolar worth Facebook and the worlds youngest billionaire at just twenty one cetriang...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-one
...the worlds youngest billionaire at just twenty one cetriangly didn't have to wait for...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erberg. Facebook founded by Zucherberg, is currently, and has been for the past ...
^^
Line 5, column 628, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of the work'?
Suggestion: of the work
...uld say that reflects and appreciationg of he work and the gratness of Zucherberg. Whil...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...work and the gratness of Zucherberg. While there are situation s where the greatne...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'situations'?
Suggestion: situations
...tness of Zucherberg. While there are situation s where the greatness of an individual ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...usly as in the case of Mark Zucherberg. While in other cases it takes a while to real...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n other cases it takes a while to really
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, so, while, for example, in fact, in some cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81058495822 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90099886505 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493036211699 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.789280566 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2380952381 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0952380952 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13438043275 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444230185865 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752261867265 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876257721559 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484403937624 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.