The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
Over the last couple of centuries, machines have assisted humans to achieve great development in the human society and helped human attain extensive knowlegde. The prompt claims that the machine will never be able to surpass a human brain, as machine is just a tool of human mind. However, I mostly disagree with the above argument for two main reasons, that I will elucidate below. Although, I do concede that a human brain is quite intricate and it can be challenging for a machine to supplant it.
To begin, the machine are able to perform a given task with much better efficiency than human in many cases. The are no doubts to the above claim as we can see many examples of these in our day-to-day life. Machine are replacing human in many laborious work. Machines can work in environment where human cannot even survive and a perfect example of this is the Mars rover. Machines have even given a toe-to-toe competition to the grand master in a game of chess. Thus, it is fair to say that machine can perform task better than humans in many fields. These claims is likely to be more strengthened as the time progresses.
Secondly, there is a great development in the working of machines in the last few decades. Machine learning, neural networks and other such discipline of science and mathematics is a major boon in the development of machine. With the advance of AI (Artificial Intelligence), machines to a good extent are even able to replicate task which were earlier consider to be impossible for a machine. Examples of such task include converting a text to speech with a good fluency, autonomous driving, etc. With the advance of humanoid robots like Sofia (a well-known humanoid robot) the boundaries between the human and machines have been reduced significantly. Recent technologies like ChatGPT(which is an AI assitant) is considered to be a boon in the field of AI. Hence, we can say that machine are becoming more and more human like and might just pass humans someday.
Lastly, however, there certains skepticism among the scholars about the extent to which machine can advance. As of today, even the most complicated super computer is not on par to which the human brain can perform calculations within a timeframe. Also, there is factor of emotion which is still propriety to humans. But with the recent development of quantum computer the first scenario is likely to disappear. Also, if we factor in the age, machine is still in the novice stage and someday machine might develope complicate functionality like showing emotions.
In conclusion, I believe it is still too early to comment whether machine can surpass humans and it will just be a tool to a human mind.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...er efficiency than human in many cases. The are no doubts to the above claim as we can ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...han humans in many fields. These claims is likely to be more strengthened as the t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, well, in conclusion, no doubt, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8546637744 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70877954961 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470715835141 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7065795304 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.25 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2083333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45833333333 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295112610438 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931561081838 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662343367806 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194721458302 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585556279671 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...er efficiency than human in many cases. The are no doubts to the above claim as we can ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...han humans in many fields. These claims is likely to be more strengthened as the t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, well, in conclusion, no doubt, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8546637744 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70877954961 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470715835141 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7065795304 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.25 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2083333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45833333333 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295112610438 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931561081838 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662343367806 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194721458302 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585556279671 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.