Human activities have had a major influence on the extinction of many species. Activities like hunting, deforestation for building homes, highways, industries, etc. have caused many species to become endangered or even extinct. The prompt claims that society should only be concerned in saving species that have become endangered because of human activities. I mostly disagree with this argument for two main reasons, which I will elucidate below. However, as it stands today, protecting this endangered species comes at a cost.
To begin, it cannot be stated with certainty that humans have absolutely no role in making the species extinct. Humans’ activities severely affect the environment, thus indirectly affecting the natural habitals of these species. Water contamination, climate change, air pollution have significant contribution in destroying the ecology and thus indirectly affecting this species. Many species are significantly reduced in number, and when such species face natural calamities, it becomes difficult for them to recover from them. Extinction of even one species from the food chain due to human activity can severely damage the food chain. Thus, even indirectly, humans have influenced the extinction and endangerment of the species.
Secondly, humans considered themselves to be the smartest and most intellectual of all the other species. This make the human morally responsible for protecting the mother nature and as well as the animals surving in it. Humans’ activities have resulted in the extinction of many species in the past. Many animals are hunted to this date to obtain certain elements from them, and many of them are killed just for display purposes. For example, elephants are hunted for their husks, and rhinos are hunted for their horns. Therefore, it is the responsibility of humans to protect such species. In some way or another, each animal has played some role in maintaining the ecology. Thus, it is to the mutual benefit of humans to protect other species as well. Also turning a blind eye for other species raises a question on the human moral. Hence, humans should take efforts in protecting all the species.
However, protecting these species comes with a cost that human societies need to bear together. These endangered species need special attention, like protection from natural calamities and other predators. Building establishment for these species involves cost to the government. However, such costs can be mitigated with appropriate strategies. Like building zoo and wild santuary attracts tourists. Countries like China have created a monopoly on pandas across the world. Even if this is a debatable argument, one cannot disagree that this has prevented pandas from going extinct.
In conclusion, as a part of this one nature, it is the responsibility of humans to show care for all the species. As this species have helped in some manner maintaining the homeostatis in nature that humans benefit from the most.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 756, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...umans to protect other species as well. Also turning a blind eye for other species r...
^^^^
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...umans to show care for all the species. As this species have helped in some manner...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2526.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38592750533 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83330442877 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477611940299 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 792.0 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4663756609 60.3974514979 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.4838709677 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1290322581 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.67741935484 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247730063326 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778305910789 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565529621811 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155161530399 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519227401825 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.39 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.