The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d

Essay topics:

The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

In recent years, a highly a highly advance of technology sparked a debate centering around the relationship between machine and human. There is a say that humans are definitely superior to the machine by virtue of that such techniques are just tool for people. From my point of view, invented by human though machines are, mankind cannot think of machine is junior to them with arrogance. With the rapid development of technology, there is a tendency that technology has its own mind to dominate people gradually.

In the first place, I have to admit that human mind is superior to machines since most of the machines are invented by mankind. When we date back to the history, it is since the industrial revolution that people first had the concept of utilizing the machine, or we called technology in the latter time to accelerate the production. For example, Fute, came up with the conception of standard line to proliferate the production process and earn more margin. Sequentially, abundant formulation of technological applicant coming from the human mind began to benefit human beings, such as washing machine, air conditioner, transportation, etc. From this perspective, there is no doubt that machines are only tools of human beings. What's more, the difference between human and any other creature in the world, which is unique and cherished by people, is the ability of thinking. As a result, human can figure out the abstruseness and realize it. Therefore, by utilizing the machines that human beings transfer their life a better one. Thus, human mind is superior to the machines.

However, when it comes into the modern era, human mind, for some people, are not always confident confronting with the steadily developing technology. To some extent, the machinery are gradually governing human beings. The aforementioned example of industrial revolution can illustrate my arguments. When the capitalist enjoy the ample benefits brought by the machine revolution, people from lower class are despaired by the standard line and cumbersome machine, which, is called alienation by the famous sociologist Carl Max. Due to the machine production, many works’s rational mind is damaged, because the timely works robbing their time for relax and thinking with no extra pay. Additionally, in the twenty-first century, when most of the people get rid of the repeating work, they are still dominated by the technology such as smart phone whoever rich or poor. Adversely, focusing on smart phone has been an epidemic in the modern society and people have lost the capability of utilizing it . As a consequence, they is no exaggeration to say that human mind are on the edge of being yield to the highly-developed machine.

In addition, despite the addict to technology applicant and alienated by the production machine, there is another perilous advance of technology superior to the human mind that must arouse the people's consciousness. Without any doubt, it should be the artificial intelligence device. Increase of applicant is social life is clearly involved in this highly advanced technology, as is the mounting degree of dependence on the machine to tackle difficulties. As a result, the concern that human mind will be deleterious is not impractical. For example, the recent competition between Chinese and Korean master and AlphaGo predicts a gloomy ending of people mind. The permanent calmness and calculation of artificial intelligence caused the failure of human. From this perspective, we can see that human should be alert with the machines development, otherwise human mind will be no longer superior to the technology.

To put in a nutshell, it may well first to admit that the human mind is superior to the machine as all the machines are created by people. However, I do not want to maintain that there is not any negative effect on the human mind. As far as I am concerned, if human beings still not want to permit the priority of machine, the technology will teach us a lesson by dominating our mind just like many fictions portray.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'a highly'.
Suggestion: a highly
In recent years, a highly a highly advance of technology sparked a debate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('highly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('advance') instead of another adjective.
In recent years, a highly a highly advance of technology sparked a debate centerin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 728, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...achines are only tools of human beings. Whats more, the difference between human and ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1001, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...have lost the capability of utilizing it . As a consequence, they is no exaggerati...
^^
Line 5, column 1027, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...f utilizing it . As a consequence, they is no exaggeration to say that human mind ...
^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... to the human mind that must arouse the peoples consciousness. Without any doubt, it sh...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 826, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'machines'' or 'machine's'?
Suggestion: machines'; machine's
...see that human should be alert with the machines development, otherwise human mind will ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as, as a result, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 94.0 58.6224719101 160% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3406.0 2235.4752809 152% => OK
No of words: 664.0 442.535393258 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12951807229 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.07623851424 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92179561099 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 311.0 215.323595506 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468373493976 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1093.5 704.065955056 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 4.0 0.740449438202 540% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9389270185 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.870967742 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4193548387 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35483870968 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305696855584 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919494146069 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617125500362 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199415171735 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286172553999 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 164.0 100.480337079 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.