If a goal is worthy , then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
According to the statement, any path or means taken to achieve a goal that is wothy of it is always justifiable. However, I found this statement specious because it shows the dearth or various scenario of which one can think of.
First of all, we have to skeptical about the word justifiable. Justification of a wrong or vile path can be done by plethora of various facets. For example, if the path taken by anyone is lacking moral sense then justification can be done related to moral values of the person who took that mean to achieve a goal. However , justification also depends upon the knowledge of the path taken by any person (i.e. id the person taking any bogus path to find its goal but he/she does without having knowledge of the authenticity of the path then justification can be biased towards the person because it had been done by him/her due to his/her nescience of that path ).Hence , justification can be biased or unbiased.
Accordingly , the assertion of the author also depends upon on the goal too. For instance, the goal is actually a benign one and it can help a lot of upcoming generations and also help the human mankind then sometimes a path full of iniquity is also justifiable. If the pioneer of the of the aerospace The Wright Brother had taken a wrong path for the discovery of the planes then they would not have attained the position they have got in the history.
The right path taken by any person is always a justifiable one, but that path have to be a flawless one . Having even a slight of cunningness in the path might question the authenticity of the path or means. And also, if the goal is not a worthy one then any bad or rash paths pr means taken by anyone in the world can be rebuked by anyone with great moral values in his life.
Hence, according to me the justification of the path taken always depends upon the goal for which it is taken and not on the worthiness of the goal. The path should always have to be a benign one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ok that mean to achieve a goal. However , justification also depends upon the kno...
^^
Line 2, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nowledge of the path taken by any person i.e. id the person taking any bogus path...
^^
Line 2, column 662, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...er due to his/her nescience of that path .Hence , justification can be biased or u...
^^
Line 2, column 664, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
... due to his/her nescience of that path .Hence , justification can be biased or unbias...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 669, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...to his/her nescience of that path .Hence , justification can be biased or unbiased...
^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... can be biased or unbiased. Accordingly , the assertion of the author also depend...
^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons and also help the human mankind then sometimes a path full of iniquity is als...
^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'of the'.
Suggestion: of the
...ity is also justifiable. If the pioneer of the of the aerospace The Wright Brother had taken ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... but that path have to be a flawless one . Having even a slight of cunningness in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44751381215 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58276363234 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422651933702 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.6111016943 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299923894666 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119437223151 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111618055565 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192692182491 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174950878188 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 48.8420337079 129% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 12.1639044944 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.