If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable

Essay topics:

If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable

The end goal of any enterprise is to make money either by selling its products or through the services offered to clients. Any profitable business will have one product or service that they concentrate on more to make sure that their mainstream business is not affected. However, the argument asserts that doing something is always more important than the final product of the company. I disagree with the claim for two particular reasons.

Admittedly, enterprises should also spend time and money on developing new products, but this should not be their main focus. If the resulted work is a huge success and after careful considerations and testing, the new services can be chipped in as a service to its customers. However, if it spends too much amount of money and resources by making more people working on the "unguaranteed success" keeping aside the guaranteed revenue generated process, the firm may risk its value to the public.

However, not all the firms which are profitable need to spend time and other resources on research. For example, consider any law firm that serves its clients based on the. There is no big element of research here that a law firm needs to do other than catching up on the latest precedents if any. So, instead, they should focus their energy on more sure-shot revenue-generating processes like acquiring new clients, spending more time in re-reading the rules and regulations, and keeping up to date. If the firms were able to do this successfully, they can be more successful than their competitors in the ever-growing market.

Working and devoting more time to something random or even a full-fledged idea may not always result in success and enterprises have to keep this in mind. Consider the renowned industry leaders Microsoft and Apple. The main business of Microsoft Inc. is to provide software to its customers throughout the world, and selling phones is the arsenal of Apple Inc. But a few years ago, Microsoft entered the mobile market by bringing their Windows phone. For sure, the product isn't bad. It is just that people did not accept windows as an operating system for their mobile phones. As a result, the windows phone was a disaster. And since Microsoft has huge cash reserves (because of its dominance in offering its main business), it was able to withstand such an incident. Had it been a small enterprise making aggressive steps to sustain itself in the market instead of advertising and spending resources on their already well-established product, the company would have been long gone.

Every enterprise wants to be at the top of its market by competing with its competitors. And they can sustain in the market by making sure they spend just enough of their resources on research and on new products such that their mainstream business will not get impacted by this.

Votes
Average: 1.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
... products, but this should not be their main focus. If the resulted work is a huge success...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: THE_SENT_END[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...w firm that serves its clients based on the. There is no big element of research her...
^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Consider the renowned industry leaders Microsoft and Apple. The main business o...
^^
Line 7, column 475, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ir Windows phone. For sure, the product isnt bad. It is just that people did not acc...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, for example, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2376.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99159663866 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81620448427 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.9243135999 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0245644989724 0.243740707755 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00858130322782 0.0831039109588 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.024632020064 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0177432650993 0.150359130593 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278717515186 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.