If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience
The conclusion that in case both candidates are equally qualified the job should go to the one with more experience is based on the assumption that experience is always better than no experience. While this may be true in most cases but it is not necessary in all occupations.
There are some occupations where experience act as a hindrance to discharge duties in the job. Experience comes w=from the understanding of situations encountered before and solutions that worked or did not worked. This learning provides knowledge base and intuition ability to the individual. However, this itself can become a barrier to learning in a new job. Especially, in jobs that focus on innovation require one to learn new things everyday. A non-experienced person may approach it with neutral perspective and approach it from different ways. Whereas an experience person may keep on trying to relate the problem to a similar situation in the past and try to improvise it using that, leading to a poor innovation. Consider an example where a design firm needs a designer. fresh graduates may play around with new concepts and color palette. While an experienced person prefers to stick to her known industry standard pallets. There are real life examples of companies like Apple and Google who were started not by experienced employees but verdant engineers looking to break the status quo thinking outside the box.
But it is also wrong to think that experience is not an asset. When it comes to running an organization or leading a project people with experience fare far better than those with no experience. It is here that their lived experience of tackling with situations comes handy. For they have tried and tested many solutions and can foretell what may be best. An example would be a marketing firm looking for a business development officer to expand the business clientele. An experienced person brings along with him experience of closing deals, creating new touch points, handling crisis and providing stability, which a new person would lack. In the previous examples of Apple and Google we can see that the positions of responsibilities are given to professionals with extensive experience in the industry.
To summarize one cannot completely say that experience is better than no-experience in all cases. It is subjective in nature and depends on various kinds of jobs, which may or may not benefit from people with past experience. For an ideal solution a mix of fresh graduates and experienced person would be desirable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'work'
Suggestion: work
...re and solutions that worked or did not worked. This learning provides knowledge base ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 440, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ovation require one to learn new things everyday. A non-experienced person may approach ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 783, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fresh
... where a design firm needs a designer. fresh graduates may play around with new conc...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 852, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd with new concepts and color palette. While an experienced person prefers to stick ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 210, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...may or may not benefit from people with past experience. For an ideal solution a mix of fresh g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'in all cases', 'in most cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252232142857 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.158482142857 0.157235817809 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0825892857143 0.0880659088768 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0357142857143 0.0497285424764 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.03125 0.0444667217837 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122767857143 0.12292977631 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0513392857143 0.0406280797675 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91844847864 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0379464285714 0.030933414821 123% => OK
Particles: 0.00223214285714 0.0016655270985 134% => OK
Determiners: 0.107142857143 0.0997080785238 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0334821428571 0.0249443105267 134% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0200892857143 0.0148568991511 135% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2538.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 417.0 452.878318584 92% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08633093525 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369304556355 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.280575539568 0.280924506359 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.215827338129 0.200843997647 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.16067146283 0.132149295362 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91844847864 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 219.290929204 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537170263789 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 61.5378706379 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.1304347826 23.380412469 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2345405527 59.4972553346 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.347826087 141.124799967 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1304347826 23.380412469 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.478260869565 0.674092028746 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 46.1879887394 51.4728631049 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.89108910891 1.64882698954 115% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301363518424 0.391690518653 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0776074591937 0.123202303941 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0552259235163 0.077325440228 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.412837420264 0.547984918172 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146364446049 0.149214159877 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096288129731 0.161403998019 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976961561986 0.0892212321368 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.413816397311 0.385218514788 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0583241838879 0.0692045440612 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21726006876 0.275328986314 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939701480959 0.0653680567796 144% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.