Imagination is more important than knowledge in the professional and the academic world Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most

Knowledge and Imagination play a vital role in one's career. The importance of neither of them can be understated. But Knowledge in turn is the one which we can nourish and make it more fruitful while Imagination depends on mental ability of a peculiar individual. In my opinion, I partially agree with the statement and we should look inward not only the outward aspects of this argument. To bolster my opinion I am keeping in front the below three reasons.
Firstly, 'Innovation' begins where there is 'Imagination'. For instance, Steve jobs or Jeff Bezos have created a revolutionary development in their respective tele communication and technical fields which no one could beat at this present time. This started not as a serendipity instead a long research and effort is involved to build this vast empire. Of course knowledge plays a vital role but it only helps in finding a job not to start an emerging business model standing in front of all like a mountain.
Secondly, without Knowledge Imagination has no importance. In a case, many affluent businessmen have entered into tele communication market like Motorola phones which promised a lot of scope in the beginning but crashed completed in few years because of lack of knowledge in the particular field. It is always advisable to grasp more awareness and then explore our own imaginative paths in that particular field. For some it might get hit with luck but most of the pledging models today evolve into a gigantic one's tomorrow by imbibing proficiency. Otherwise, It would lead to a drastic amount of loss which we could never cope up with.
Furthermore, only not in professional but also during academics one is appreciated for having a wide range of imagination in particular path. For instance, Einstein discovered law of gravitation by sitting below an apple tree. Until then indefinite number of people might have sat under it but it only struck to his mind because of a phantasmagorical view. To bolster his claims he sharpened his knowledge and published more theories providing an evidence. Not all with knowledge could profit. It is the one with exorbitant ideas gains more fruitful results.
To conclude, many would argue that knowledge is enough in professional and academic field to succeed. If this is true then there wouldn't have been a single gadget they are using available right now. Our entire life on a day to day basis is completely dependent upon the one or the other machine which made our lives easier. There are all made plausible only through a great imaginative power.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ge and Imagination play a vital role in ones career. The importance of neither of th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...essional and academic field to succeed. If this is true then there wouldnt have be...
^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... to succeed. If this is true then there wouldnt have been a single gadget they are usin...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, in particular, of course, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95348837209 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85631765878 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3516150983 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.75 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18207400672 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497583772022 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354785615738 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990953993392 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336676998006 0.0667264976115 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.