The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.
The matra for 21st century is to maintain a lifestyle that helps people to lessen that time they spend on doing things. Fast-paced lofe has crated wonder such as speech to text conversion which enables a give a voice input that cab v converted in a text, metro trains is another example to skip th traffic that is being raised to decrease the travel time. Millennials are habituated to a rapid-paced lifestyle that is creating an enormous problem than finding solutions to many existing issues.
People want a rapid-paced lifestyle because everyone is tired of waiting. Generally, millennials are thinking that a fast-paced life is necessary to lead a busy life. For example, everyone wants to travel fast, because they want to reach their schools and offices in time so that at the end of the day they can reach home and take some rest. However, no one really cares about the pollution and global warning caused by these vehicles. In the beginning, when transportation was discovered, people used these transportation services to travel long distances, but today everyone are using these services to transport quickly. Ultimately, no body is observing the traffic problem, the pollution that is being arised due to the rapid-paced life.
Meanwhile, rapid-paced life need everything to be made quickly, this futhur leads to another gigantic problem that is, we are building and creating things in a hurry. At the end, people are not considering the quality of the issue but, they are worrying about the quantity. We see that many government ganted building for the backward casts and to the poor are destroyed if there is a diasterous rain. This is because govertment is concentrating to build houses quickly as promised to the people, but they are no worrying about the quality of the houses. Unsuprisingly, people suffer due to this and construction of houses should be a solution to the poor, but it is rather creating a havoc instad of precipitating the problem.
Although, rapid-paced life can save a lot of time and effort, but the traditinal methods of dealing a problem is completely changed in the 21st century. People are choosing a rapid-lifestyle even after knowing its diversed effects and as disccused earlier, rapid-paced life is neccesary to live in this world which wants everything to be done quickly. Yes, the fact that saving time and effort is happening at the cost of the quality. A best example that can be used to understand the problem statement is, people travel with high speeds to reach their destination faster. However, they done realise that speed thrills but kills.
Apart from all the benefits a rapid-paced life offers, there are quiet a few drawbacks of having a fast-paced life. People wants everything to be fast, but still there are many traditinal things that will be done at slow pace. For example, people are using hybrid seeds for agriculture, but these seds cntains a lot of chemicals thhat caused harm to the end buyer. There is a nessesity to maintain a steady pace for few things such as, agriculture, baby birth, etc.
In conclusion, everyone wasnts a fast-pased lifestyle because pople have lost patience to wait. In a hurry to achieve things faster people are causing a great harm to the environment, society and to themselves. Mostly, millinneals have not time to spare to live their busy life. Fast-paced life can save time and money but it is also costing us much more than the advantages we get for it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (th) must be used with a third-person verb: 'traffics'.
Suggestion: traffics
...ro trains is another example to skip th traffic that is being raised to decrease the tr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...vices to transport quickly. Ultimately, no body is observing the traffic problem, the p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun government seems to be countable; consider using: 'many governments'.
Suggestion: many governments
...orrying about the quantity. We see that many government ganted building for the backward casts ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 436, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: The
...s happening at the cost of the quality. A best example that can be used to unders...
^
Line 7, column 588, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'did'?
Suggestion: did
...their destination faster. However, they done realise that speed thrills but kills. ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s such as, agriculture, baby birth, etc. In conclusion, everyone wasnts a fast-pa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, still, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 19.5258426966 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2887.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 584.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94349315068 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91590194646 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77284720533 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484589041096 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 904.5 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6520303511 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.925925926 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6296296296 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.59259259259 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265049610359 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744465688394 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768816941658 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142425597372 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326065444193 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.