Investing in research which may have controversial results
“Efforts and courage are not enough without purpose and direction”, one of the famous dialogues of John F. Kennedy. To explore the world and to invent new things is the utmost desire of many ravenous scientists. The more the people are research oriented, the more the range of knowledge of will be enriched. However, without particular goal, there will be no definitive result. Moreover, almost every research outcome prevail controversy which will ensure better accuracy. Therefore, I agree with the statement regarding investing more in controversial results.
The aim of research not only to invent something unprecedented but also to answer some incendiary topics that raise disagreement for long times. For example, as an environmental specialist, it will easier to research on those topics like on how to control air or water parameters or which metals are harmful for our environment. However, it will be tough to work on how to handle rubbish, garbages or sludge from industries. On the other hand, this painstaking issue will face more controversies and perplexing results. For this reason, higher financial support is needed for this specific research.
Secondly, some research works will come up with skeptical results. The more the result will be doubtful the more the final outcome will be accurate. For example, in order to avoid discrepancy or controversy, everyone try double check their works with authenticity. The number of experiments are higher to check the efficacy of the result. It will be remembered in mind, that a flawless invention will surely enhance their career as well as serving the nation. A fallacious project will not able to survive in the long run as controversy will highly deteriorate the quality of the work. Therefore, more time and sufficient financial aid should be given to reach into a final conclusion.
On the other hand, it will be beneficial if the other less argumentative research field can get financial help. As there is no negative point on inventing new things.
In conclusion it can be said that a research with a definite goal will surely reach its destination. In addition the more troublesome the results will be the more accurate the quality of the research.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... research field can get financial help. As there is no negative point on inventing...
^^
Line 9, column 35, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
.... In conclusion it can be said that a research with a definite goal will surely reach ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...l will surely reach its destination. In addition the more troublesome the results will b...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19889502762 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94514524747 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3926529934 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.5454545455 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16423641089 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544970059196 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509554206551 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103460775491 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488072874221 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.