Investments in life-saving technology are more valuable than investments in technology related to entertainment or luxury.
Technology might be multifaceted and often considered the best way to improve our lives but innovation of upcoming technologies often requires careful planning and strategizing since finding the optimum balance between investment for luxury or for saving lives either through medical development or developing more healthier products depends largely on the return on investment. However, numbers cannot define the value of a human life and hence, I opine that investment in medical research is far more urgent than investment for luxury goods and services.
The issue topic clearly states that life saving technology is much more important, most likely supported by the fact that health is above wealth. A person who is unhealthy to enjoy luxuries has no real value of materialistic goods. Hence, even though people nowadays are willing to pay a lot more for seemingly futuristic gadgets, however medical research still has a huge demand both in the public and private sector. This is because such research often leads to saving millions of lives rather than a few and those millions contribute to the development of human beings much more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...rough medical development or developing more healthier products depends largely on the return ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 58.6224719101 32% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 2235.4752809 43% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 182.0 442.535393258 41% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 4.55969084622 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70463649458 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 215.323595506 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.659340659341 0.4932671777 134% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 704.065955056 43% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.6476695784 60.3974514979 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.333333333 118.986275619 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.97078651685 40% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267101748808 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116760867452 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841051788624 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209705055055 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592462301861 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 100.480337079 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.