“Investments in life-saving technology are more valuable than investments in technology related to entertainment or luxury.”
Funding in technology is very much essential in the present day scenario. People are relying more and more on technology for various works either official or personal. If we compare and contrast the funding on various technologies, we get to know that there is more and more necessity in funding in life-saving technology.
Technology itself comprises of many aspects and if investors are interested they have many options. But one of the risk with the technology is that it changes very quickly. There are two types of investments in the technology: growth investment and income investment. Growth investment involves purchasing shares in companies that are expected to grow with time and this investment has a lot of analyst’s attention. Income investment involves investing in well established companies that offer income.
On comparing the life-saving technologies and luxury technologies, we’ll get to know the real necessity in investing. Examples of existing life-saving technologies include: Intellidot system, Smart pill GI monitoring system, cellvizio, simplicity catheter system, TOGA system, transcend cypass, talking defibrillators, one touch ping, etc. Examples of existing luxury technologies include: push notifications, geo fencing, beacon, augmented reality examples, big data, artificial intelligence, virtual reality, drones, instant messages, IOT, etc.
Though the development in luxury technology is important, there is an urge to develop of life-saving technologies. With the advent of many diseases, there is a drastic increase in the health related issues. Various diseases such as cancers, diabetes, heart attacks, HIV-AIDS and many more are becoming common. There are many chances that elderly people are being affected by these after forties. If more and more technologies are developed then maybe we can try to foresee the danger and try to cure the disease. After all, healthy life is a wealthy life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...saving technology. Technology itself comprises of many aspects and if investors are inter...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, well, after all, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 291.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71134020619 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0993401291 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584192439863 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4118409021 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7647058824 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82352941176 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375635639589 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107161078039 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602537945494 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199349566031 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473075554997 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.