Issue Essay:-Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.

It is believed that most of the discoveries are made through painstaking efforts and years of working behind the closed doors of laboratories. While it is true that inventions need arduous efforts and perseverance, but we can not deny the fact that many of the inventions we enjoy today are a result of serendipity. I completely agree with the authors stance and there are copious of examples in retrospect to support this claim.

First of all, we should acknowledge the fact that despite of hard work and wisdom, fortune also play a key role sometimes. Having said that, it does not mean that only good fortune is responsible for the seminal innovation, but a combined effect of, wisdom, perseverance and fortune, produce the desired results. Consider, for example, the discovery of X-rays. In 1979, a German scientist named Wilhelm was conducting some experiment with the cathode tube. Suddenly he realized that despite the fact that tube was covered, he saw nearby fluorescent screen would glow when the tube was on and the room was dark. The rays were somehow illuminating the screen. He tried to block the rays but most things he placed in front of them did not seem to make the difference. When he placed his hand in front of tube, he noticed he could see his bones in the image that was projected on the screen. He then replaced the tube with photographic plate to capture the images and thereby creating the first X-rays.

In addition to that, many of the discoveries took several decades for the applications of the accidental theories. It should also be noticed that to take the research forward scientists from the later generations toiled for years to further the accidental findings and those scientists must also be praised for their efforts. For instance, the discovery of the Insulin is example of such event. Two scientists were studying the role pancreas play in the digestion of the food. In an experiment on a dog, they removed his pancreas to study its effects on digestion. Suddenly, few days later they observed that files were swarming around the urine of the dog- something abnormal and unexpected. They tested the urine and found sugar in urine. They then realized that by removing his pancreas they have given diabetes to dog. Though they never figured out which secretion from pancreas caused to control bold sugar but that provided ground for future generation to further research. Four decade later the scientists from the university of Toronto found blood sugar controlling agent and named it Insulin.

In conclusion, history itself is testimony to the claim of the author. Perhaps my personal view is that along with fortune other elements also devote, to some degree, for discovery of ground breaking innovations.

Average: 1.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 345, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...erendipity. I completely agree with the authors stance and there are copious of example...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2297.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98264642082 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63340385309 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542299349241 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9832008528 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7083333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2083333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.20833333333 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0491647056082 0.243740707755 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0153783779364 0.0831039109588 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028080028841 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0373115114332 0.150359130593 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302225545541 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.