Humans starts learning right from the moment of birth. While growing up a child may have several distinct phases of learning from imitating their parents at childhood to academical learning. It is believed that our learning phase continue till our demise. Let it be any form of learning, teaching skills are vitally important. As in academic learning, a trained pedagogue has better understanding of the methods of teaching. He knows when, where and how to overcome negative actions and praise a student for positive ones. So in my opinion, both actions- negative as well as positive- should be considered while teaching.
First of all, no one is perfect. It is tendency of every being to commit mistakes and learn from them. In fact, committing mistakes is also considered as a part of learning process. It is the duty of the teacher to use the right approach at the right time. He must find a right balance between praising the positive actions and when required, he must not refrain himself from taking corrective measures for wrongdoing of the students. Consider, for example, a student who is good at Algebra is struggling with geometry problems. Although he good at specific math but if he is to be a good mathematician then his/her teacher need to make him aware of mistakes while doing Geometry. If not, how will that student improve at Geometry? Being unaware, that student will keep on practicing wrong methods. Contrary to that, if the student is panned for only negative actions and not praised for positive doings then this might eventually lead to discouragement.
Secondly, if the one is ware of his/her wrong doings then one tries to correct himself/herself. This process equips oneself with great tool known as self-correction. Another important characteristic of implementing this technique- making one ware of negative actions- is the quality of being pliant, which in today's world is considered as one of the essentials in work culture. If a working professional is imbibed with such quality, then it almost doubles the rate of his success after his education.
In conclusion, humans keep on learning throughout their entire life span. They learn from the society they live in, from friend circle during adolescence, their colleagues in offices and other elements which is part of their life. But this learning process is more effective when humans are aware about the results of their actions.
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 58
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 83
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sur 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to right'
Suggestion: to right
Humans starts learning right from the moment of birth. While growing...
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...earning right from the moment of birth. While growing up a child may have several dis...
Line 1, column 565, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
...o in my opinion, both actions- negative as well as positive- should be considered while te...
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...s also considered as a part of learning process. It is the duty of the teacher to use t...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07518796992 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80493119744 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553884711779 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4261825784 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.375 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119649876048 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317354567897 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513827462114 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0670378706612 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324087858992 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.