In order to become well rounded individuals all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry novels mythology and other types of imaginative literature Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or

The author of the argument has alluded the importance of the various courses in overall development of the students. Although, the fictitious courses could aid the understanding of art and literature, but their role in overall development is perhaps debatable. In my opinion, it is rather society, hard work and perseverance of an individual towards his goal that contribute most in overall development of an individual.

First of all, it is impractical for an individual to acquire knowledge and expertise in all fields given the limitations of human brain and understanding. Moreover, even if a person is gifted with such capability, shouldn’t he utilize that dexterity in furthering his understanding of fields of his interest rather than devoting time in trivial activities, at least according to his stance. Consider, for example, a college student willing to further his studies in mechanical engineering. In order to follow his dream, he is required to score well, do research and experiments and write research papers. The student is already subjected to immense academic pressure and any further digression will cause his grades to suffer and might inhibit his understanding of core subjects. The compulsion to study fictitious literature will only exacerbate the already saturated capability. So, students must be privileged with the freedom, whether or not, they want to opt for the courses outside their filed of study.

In addition to that, nowadays, students tend to choose their career path at very early stages of life mostly even before completion of high schools. They invest their time in accomplishing goals given the level of current competition. Due to this devotion they develop deep interest in a specific field and other courses are insipid to them. So, what’s the point of gorging the students into courses unsavory to them. Lack of interest will not serve the purpose argued by the author.
On the contrary, one might argue that possessing the knowledge of imaginative literature will help them survive and contribute to the society they live in. But I will still defend my stand since everyone contribute to society in a different manner and life lessons are learned from experience not only from books. For instance, a doctor serving his patients, an engineer responsible for seminal innovations, anthropologists excavate to trace human history and philanthropists serving the needy. The all have different roles to play in society and contribute to progress in different manners.

To sum up with, rendering student’s freedom to choose courses they want to study, is in the interest of the students and the society as a whole. We are aware of the notion that trifling burden, in any form, will scuttle the aim of an individual.

Average: 8.2 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 937, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ts must be privileged with the freedom, whether or not, they want to opt for the courses outsi...
Line 6, column 227, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different manner" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nd since everyone contribute to society in a different manner and life lessons are learned from exper...
Line 8, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
... will scuttle the aim of an individual.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, still, well, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2339.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25617977528 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01249009604 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552808988764 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 740.7 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1836487092 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.380952381 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1904761905 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04761904762 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100223344866 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315765198097 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275437484616 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0549499414105 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176639312402 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.